Hej. We are looking for
one or two more papers for the following session:
Call for Papers
for the AAG
“The Normalcy
of Urban Neoliberalism and its Limits”
Annual Meeting
of the Association of American Geographers (AAG) in New York
(February 24-28, 2012)
Organizers: Susanne Heeg, Robert Pütz, Felix
Silomon-Pflug and Anne Vogelpohl (Goethe University Frankfurt
(Main), Germany)
*Sponsored by
the Urban Geography Specialty Group*
The neoliberal
“re-ordering of cities” has to be understood within the stress
ratio of global conditions and specific local requirements. As a
result urban neoliberalism is shaped by local adaption,
transformation and implementation of globally available urban
policies. Solving local crises and preparing cities for
interurban global competition can be seen as purposes of this
“travelling of policies”. The mobility of urban politics has led
to the normalization of neoliberal urban development as well as
the corresponding analytic perspective on cities. As this
process of normalization yet remains a contested process that is
resisted, obstructed or avoided in many ways it can be
understood as a constant stretching of limits – e.g. through
policies that strengthen the ability to co-opt critique or
de-politicize social movements. But limits to urban
neoliberalism’s normalcy may also hint at a post-neoliberal
change.
We invite paper
proposals that either analyze the process of enforcing the urban
neoliberal character or that analyze limitations to
neoliberalization and potentially post-neoliberal urban
development. The former include re-orderings of administrations
or policy guidelines; the latter include re-interpretations of
failed policies and deepened inequalities (shrinkage,
marginalization etc.) or concepts and perspectives for
alternative cities (“just city”, “right to the city”,
peoples/participatory budgets etc.).
Within this
field the papers may address, but are not limited to the
following questions:
·
How are mobile urban policies adapted, transformed
and implemented and what are the effects for the re-ordering of
urban configurations/assemblages?
·
Which role does the travelling of urban policies
play for the normalization of neoliberal urban development?
·
How are contradictions between market- and
competition-oriented restructurings on the one hand and a
socially just/ livable city discourse on the other reconciled?
·
Is the neoliberal city depoliticized and, if so,
what are the consequences for modes of participation/
(self)representation?
·
Is the neoliberal character of the urban reinvented
or overcome in the course of the ongoing economic crisis? What
are the limits of neoliberal adaptability?
·
Which theories and concepts can be used to conceive
a post-neoliberal change?
Please submit a ~250-word abstract by September 25, 2011 to Anne
Vogelpohl ([log in to unmask])
Best regards,
anne.