Print

Print


Dear All,

A recent claim posted to the list was:

"The choice ... is between having reviews written by somebody with some
linkage (and dependency) from the industry, having them written by someone
who has little idea of what is writing about, on having no reviews at all."

This categorization, like George Bush's categorization of states that were
"with him or against him" (one might be unsure) is questionable.

There are a great number of people who are eminently qualified to write
narrative reviews who have no ties to industry. People in my limited
circle who are experts in their fields but have no industry ties include
Professor Jeffrey Aronson who is an expert in Clinical Pharmacology, Sir
Iain Chalmers, who is an expert in systematic reviews, Mike Clarke, an
expert in many things and there are many others in the UK, Canada, the US,
Italy, Denmark, and elsewhere.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, even if we can't find an expert in the precise field who
has no industry ties, there are many experts in related fields who are
eminently qualified to write narrative reviews in these fields. In fact
coming from a related field might offer a fresh perspective. (To name just
one example, Louis Pasteur was not a medical doctor.) Indeed the promise
of an editorial in a prominent journal that would change practice would be
a sufficient motivation for many potential 'related' experts to write
fantastic, and less problematic reviews.


Jeremy


* please note my email address is now [log in to unmask]
--

Jeremy Howick PhD, MSc, PGCert, DipSoc, BA
MRC/ESRC Postdoctoral Fellow
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
University of Oxford
Oxford OX3 7LF
United Kingdom
www.cebm.net
www.primarycare.ox.ac.uk/dept_staff/jeremy-howick/
eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-140519667X,descCd-authorInfo.htm
l




On 13/08/2011 04:34, "Piersante Sestini" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>The choice then is between having reviews written by somebody with some
>linkage (and dependency) from the industry, having them written by
>someone who has little idea of what is writing about, on having no
>reviews at all.