 |
 |
Hello Caroline, you're right, but Gasparini's thesis is atypical. His "Matriarchy" is more complex and specific only of the ancient layer of slavs, survived sometimes in the folklore. Indeed this is, nowadays, the least acceptable pattern of the book; but it doeas not damage its organic, rigorous, comparative and ethnological importance. D. 2011/8/22 Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]> > Hi there, > > I'm wondering about this term 'matriarchy'? I was under the impression that > anthropologists had never come across a matriarchal society. (Excuse me if > I'm barking up the wrong tree and you're actually talking about supernatural > beings, but if you're talking about humans, then I'm still asking the > question). > > ~Caroline. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Society for The Academic Study of Magic [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Davide Ermacora > Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 3:11 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] Important re-issue on slavic folklore > > An important news. For all those who understand italian with interests in > slavic anthropology, mythology and folklore, i point out the re-issue [2010] > of Evel Gasparini's magnum opus "Il matriarcato slavo. Antropologia > culturale dei Protoslavi" (846 pages), probably the most eminent italian > scholar of the slavic world. The first luckless edition of this book [1973] > was formerly very rare to find. You can download for FREE all the entire new > edition (e.g. well reviewed by Eliade, On the Slavic matriarchy, «History of > Religions», 14, 1 (1974), pp. 74-78), expanded by an important introductory > essay, another paper by Gasparini on the finns-slavs relationships and first > Gasparini's complete bibliography, from the website of the publisher Firenze > University Press: http://www.fupress.com/scheda.asp?IDV=2038 > > Here you can find more details: > http://historiareligionum.blogspot.com/2011/05/il-matriarcato-slavo-di-evel-gasparini.html > D. >