 |
 |
Dear Urs, You can do even better than that by using robust averaging. That's ideal exactly for artefacts like yours and would suppress them but still use the rest of the data even for the same channel and trial. Excluding whole trials is a standard approach in EEG analysis whereas excluding channel/trials will complicate things unnecessarily. Vladimir On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Urs Bachofner <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear Vladimir, > > please have a look at the picture in the attachment. > > Wouldn't it be an improvement, if in future in such cases we could declare a > channel (see the red circle) as bad for the one trial instead of having to > declare the whole trial as bad? > > Just a suggestion, thanks for all your work, > > Urs > > > > > -- > NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone