 |
 |
Hello Fran, I was advised by the RSC that it is okay for us to post-prints that are set out using their template in our institutional repository. These look almost identical to the final published version, but don't have the volume and issue details, DOI or page numbers. On the other hand, other publishers (e.g. Taylor and Francis, Elsevier) don't seem to like us to use anything with their layout or branding. Hope this helps, Katie. Fran Callaghan wrote: > Hi All. > > Recently we've been seeing an increasing amount of deposits where the author claims to have no author prepared copy because they have been encouraged/told to use either publisher templates or publisher's online tools to edit their articles from an early stage. This clearly diminishes the chance of an author prepared copy at the end of the publication process and so we can't archive (even where the publisher 'allows' deposit of author copy). > > Has this been noted or dicussed elsewhere and if so are there proposed paths forward? > > Thanks, > Fran > -- Katie Evans Repository Support Librarian Library, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK Tel: 01225 385114 Email: [log in to unmask] Working pattern: Mon - Wed