 |
 |
Dear Joyce and All, As far as I am aware, the French term 'handicape(e)', which seems to be the standard word for disabled does not seem to have the same negative connotations as 'handicapped'. (The term handicapped itself seems to be acceptable in USA, but not UK.) I have also found it difficult to discover whether personnes handicapees (disabled people) is preferable to handicape(e)s (the disabled) and there is also the vexed question of gender neutral language. Not all disabled people are male. There is then the issue of which (people) with impairment specific words are acceptable, which ones are unacceptable and which ones are preferable in different languages. Or is impairment specific language by its nature medical model? I also get the impression that language politics is more developed/more of an issue in some countries and/or languages than others. Hopefully this will develop everyone, but needs to develop from inside rather than outside. At least websites etc allow you to easily update language usage as you become aware of better options. Marion On 21/06/2011 16:36, Joyce Cook wrote: > Dear Colleagues > > _Centre for Access to Football in Europe_ > > Please can anyone help with some guidance or signposting? > > We are a European wide NGO working in football to improve access for fans. You > can find some more information on our website @ www.cafefootball.eu > <http://www.cafefootball.eu> > > I have 3 questions please. > > Firstly. We are trying to encourage the use of social model terms and language > amongst the European football family. To this end, we are suggesting > alternatives to specifically offensive medical and stereotypical words such as > ‘handicapped’ and ‘invalid’. However, when looking for social model alternatives > within the French language it seems that no such alternatives exist. We would > like to translate the term ‘disabled person’ but there is (as far as we are > aware) simply no French word for ‘disabled’ according to our translators and > local contacts in France and Belgium. Please could someone advise? > > Secondly. Please can anyone provide me with papers/information about current > practices of categorising disabled people across Europe (ideally beyond the EU) > as we cover the UEFA region of 53 countries? We’ve noted the recent > interest/discussions to consider a European disabled person’s ID card. I believe > that this was discussed at last year’s EU EDPD Conference which I missed because > of grounded flights. As I understand, there was a motion to proceed with this > idea. I am aware of some countries that have such ID. It’s not something that we > are at all excited by – very medical model. Some disabled fans want to see the > introduction of an ID card but we are not so sure. We would like to understand > this concept and level of practice in more detail. > > Thirdly. Many football clubs seek ‘proof of disability’ for disabled fans who > require a PA ticket (free of charge) as a reasonable adjustment to attend > matches. Is there any guidance or precedence for such practice? The Blue Badge > scheme in the UK seems to be the closest example where proof and/or a doctor’s > assessment letter is required to obtain an accessible parking badge. A number of > large service providers (events and museums, etc.) seek proof wherever they deem > there to be any doubt!!! It’s a complex area with much debate. The advice we > have received for the UK is that a service provider could/should only seek proof > where there is considerable doubt about eligibility. However, most clubs seem to > do this as a matter of routine. Legislation in this regard varies (or is > completely non-existent) across the wider European region. It’s a red hot potato > and we are trying to find the right way forward. > > Many thanks for any assistance with any/all of the 3 questions. > > Very best > > Joyce > > *Joyce Cook* > > *Managing Director* > > *CAFE - Centre for Access to Football in Europe <http://www.cafefootball.eu/>* > > *Total Football Total Access* > > Registered Charity No. 1131339 > PO Box 145, FLINT, CH6 9DH, United Kingdom > > /This email and its contents, together with any attachments, is confidential to > the sender and the intended recipient(s). If you receive this email in error > please advise us by replying to the sender of this email. Please also delete and > destroy this email, together with any attachments and any copies from your > system immediately. > > Any unauthorised storage, use, disclosure, copying, distribution or > dissemination of this email or any part of it is strictly prohibited and may be > illegal. > > CAFE does not act in any legal capacity or as registered access consultants, and > makes no representation and gives no warranty as to the accurateness or > suitability of any advice contained within this email. The views expressed in > this email are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CAFE. > > CAFE makes no representation and gives no warranty as to absence of viruses in > relation to this email or its attachments. We recommend that you scan this email > and attachments for viruses./ > > ________________End of message________________ > > This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability > Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). > > Enquiries about list administration should be sent to > [log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > > Archives and tools are located at: > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html > <http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html> > > You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page. > ________________End of message________________ This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask] Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.