There are a lot of different ways of understanding a taxi - In poor countries, for instance, it can represent a multi-dimensional node connecting a variety of soft networks
relating social and labour processes to mobility. Looking at the idea of mobility, moreover, surely what is important about the taxi is less the form of mobility it constitutes itself, but the role it plays as a conduit for the survival auto-mobility of others,
particularly in a poor country of the global south?
I think therefore that visualizing and reifying the taxi for any knowledge it may represent embodied in one person or group of people is less important than how the taxi is
linked into socio-economic networks and what that can tell us about urban connectivity. Looking at connectivity avoids boundaries and definition, in fact in makes a virtue of eliding process and function. Concentrating on the reification of the taxi (for me)
makes the mistake of assuming that there is necessarily a knowledge embodied in that monad independent of the context in which the taxi/driver is located.
If a taxi works in the ranchos of Venezuela, it works in a constantly changing environment in which the fixity of location itself is permanently on the move as the ranchos change
and expand, with no fixed addresses, street names or numbers. What kind of knowledge arises from that constant fluidity? In Nicaragua, as another example, because there are no (or very few) street names, numbers etc even in the big cities, an address is given
as (for example) ‘de la iglesia magdalena una cuadra al sur, media cuadra al lago y dos al este’ (from the church of mary magdalen one block to the south, half a block towards the lake and two to the east). All spatial knowledge is therefore directed from
specific, frequently temporary communal referents; what form of knowledge does this reproduce?
Poverty is intimately linked to mobility and in the poorer countries of the global south taxi travel becomes something far different from the non-essential (luxury?) item it
is in the richer countries, because of the frequently dysfunctional nature of public or mass transport. It becomes an essential component of work, education and health care. The taxi is also a strongly gendered space – no matter which country, taxis are overwhelmingly
masculinized work spaces and very few women drive taxis. A male taxi driver can therefore form an important component of the life of a poor southern woman whilst knowing very little about the intricacies of her socio-cultural spatiality (and the role played
by the taxi in it), the reproductive and productive priorities (however defined) of her life.
Is ‘the knowledge’ or any taxi-derived, cartographic way of understanding the city a purely (or overwhelmingly) masculine form of knowledge that, far from representing some
special insight, is inherently partial and exclusionary? If it is, a taxi may therefore represent a critical conjuncture of survival processes whilst also being (in terms of knowledge and ‘knowing’ the city) an interface of socio-cultural and gendered disjuncture.
Sorry GS popped you out there. As I'm from the GS, I dislike the term, it
makes little sense, so I tend to use it flippantly. I've also been known to
refer to my place of abode as the NH (northern hemisphere) if anyone dares
to use the word "Africa" as if it's a country.
As you can guess, I spend a lot of time standing with hands punched on my
hips with a stare of rigid disapproval.
Great point and one I was working towards - how do you define, shall we say,
taxi driving (as opposed to driver)?
Carole Enahoro
-----Original Message-----[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Cloke
From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
Sent: 24 June 2011 21:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: taxi driving geographers
There's a real danger of objectifying the 'taxi driver' here, isn't there?
In cities across the global south (and do we really have to use the acronym
GS for this?) there are a vast range of transport-related pluriactivities
that may or may not correspond to driving a taxi. In Managua (where I've
spent some time) if you stand by the side of the road and stick your hand
out within a short time someone will stop and pick you up - they may be a
taxi-driver but equally likely they're not, they're just someone who sees a
chance to make a quick buck, particularly if you're chele, foreigner. There
are trucks that trundle across and between the cities of the pacific zone
there that don't seem to have any formal timetable, the people just gather
in a certain place and wait patiently and a truck will arrive - how they
know is quite a mystery. There are shared cars that go along set routes,
there are microbuses that take small groups of people and again have no
timetable, and most of the people who drive these things have other jobs too
- so isn't a valid starting point for this question, how do you define
taxi-driver?
And does it really make much sense to construct an icon of 'the knowledge',
in an age of SatNav?
Dr Jon Cloke
Lecturer/Research Associate
Geography Department
Loughborough University
Loughborough LE11 3TU
Office: 01509 228193
Mob: 07984 813681
________________________________________
From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hugh Crosfield
[[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 23 June 2011 13:51
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: taxi driving geographers
While i don't know of any Taxi driving geographers, I am currently working
on a NGO called Stop The Traffik who are running taxi driver workshops to
utilise the 'community knowledge' of taxi drivers with the aim of uncovering
signs of trafficking practices (the controlled movement of people into forms
of forced labour through deception). The project is in its infancy but STT
believe that taxi drivers could be key witnesses to 'new' forms of slavery
in the London area. I think this highlights how taxi drivers are connected
to informal economies of labour and policing. (any taxi drivers on this
forum like to comment?!). STT believe that more than the cognitive and
kinesthetic learning of 'the knowledge', taxi drivers combine their learned
mobility and heightened recognition of places with an understanding of less
visible cultural channels of communication and interaction. But critically,
these are perhaps unwanted responsibilities.
Anyone who has worked with taxi drivers please comment!