Print

Print


Re the taxi industry and the geographical sensibilities of taxi drivers, I
concur with Maureen Hickey re the need for research on taxi drivers in the
"Global South" (GS) to enhance the study of dynamic knowledge and value
generation through movement. Taxi drivers in the GS often have a different
role re access to the city, the relationship between rural/urban migration
and employment, access within the city (in the absence of maps or
infrastructure), the creation, thus conceptualization, of pathways, and so
forth. I refer particularly to "other" forms of transportation such as
okadas (as below), tuk-tuks, even donkey carts. This then affects
geographical sensibility, which I understand to be an intentionally and
artfully all-inclusive word at this stage.

 

Okadas (motorbike taxis) are the predominant form of commercialized
transportation in Nigeria (popn. 150 million). There have been a few smaller
studies on them but in terms of their impact on Nigerian cities
comparatively little in-depth research has been undertaken and I have come
across no geographical studies. 

 

Okada drivers have been recently banned from many city centres in the
interests of safety. Given their role in facilitating city access, this has
provoked a great deal of debate. In areas such as Lagos - with a population
upwards of 10 million - they offer a route through the city's notorious
traffic jams and crumbling infrastructure, a function replicated in other
Nigerian cities. Moreover, as in much of the GS, taxi driving offers
employment to many people, from former rural workers to unemployed
graduates, and they effectively allow the poor and those living on city
peripheries to access the city, augmenting the services of a weak mass
transit system. 

 

There is certainly an argument regarding safety: a great number are
untrained and unlicensed - indeed some cannot read road signs (not that many
exist!) - carry multiple passengers and goods, and have no equipment to
protect against injury. There are also reports of involvement in
vote-rigging, violent crime, and gang beatings at accident sites.

 

Recently okada drivers demonstrated against a new Federal Road Safety
Commission regulation introducing prohibitively expensive motorbike helmets,
wearing gourds, paint buckets and cans on their heads, even while being
photographed in one instance with a motorbike helmet strapped to the front
of the bike. This protest through irony is one I have been following in my
work on satire and city access. It effectively brought the plight of okada
drivers to the national media and then, internationally to the Nigerian
diaspora, to the Web. The campaign has had some effect, albeit limited, with
the provision of free helmets, and some easing of the outright ban in
certain cities.

 

Back to topic: given this weight of role, the concept of "geographical
sensibilities" may be much distorted by the burden of this greater
politicization, these enhanced social function(s) and an entirely different
form of social interaction. So perhaps it might be worth looking up the
scant studies on okadas (or tuk-tuks) to expand on a typically "Western"
approach.  

 

Hope this helps! And good luck - great topic.

 

Carole Enahoro

UCL Department of Geography

[log in to unmask]

 

 

  _____  

From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robin Smith
Sent: 23 June 2011 11:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: taxi driving geographers

 

The issue with taxi drivers is not a question of whether they 'know the city
better than others' (a rather banal issue and who's to judge?) but the
relationship between their mobility as practiced and the forms of spatial
knowledge that both inform and are produced in their movements. 

Taxi drivers are concerned with an 'A to B mobility', they are transporting
(to use Ingold's terms), they apply their knowledge in taking direct routes
(if they're honest) or circuitous routes if they're not. As such, the
generation of knowledge of the city (in a spatial sense) is not born of
movement but rather of routes, maps, and street layouts. And this is far
less of an interesting analytical relationship between knowing and going
than that of mobile professionals whose knowledge is produced on the move;
professionals and practitioners who are wayfarers (Ingold again). 

Outreach workers, for example, are essentially mobile too but their mobility
is directly linked to both the knowledge they have and to producing the
knowledge they need. If ever teleportation was invented taxi drivers would
be out of a job, outreach workers wouldn't be!   

Rather than simply asking whether taxi drivers know a lot about a city (of
course, they do, but so do tour guides, the homeless, police officers,
ethnographers, street-sweepers......) the interesting angle with taxi
drivers is the process through which they learn 'the knowledge' (as it's
called in London) which, I'm pretty sure, hasn't been studied thus making it
more than something that can be dismissed as a 'trendy' focus on some people
that are mobile in an urban context.   

Bests 

Rob 

Dr R.J. Smith
Researcher 
Wales Institute of Social Economic Research Data and method (WISERD)
Cardiff University 
02920 870330  
 <http://www.wiserd.ac.uk/about-us/staff/academic-staff/dr-robin-smith/>
http://www.wiserd.ac.uk/about-us/staff/academic-staff/dr-robin-smith/