Print

Print


Google instantly pointed to a Martin Bland page
http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/intro/intent.htm with a worked medical
example.

More generally, the terms seem to refer to a population and the basis
for assuming that selection was random. In the human context this may be
interpreted as volunteer bias
(http://www.psychwiki.com/wiki/What_is_volunteer_bias%3F) and avoidance
- both upsetting the "missing at random" assumption. In animal sampling
the terms are less appropriate, but there are well-known examples.  In
insects where males have wings and females do not, you clearly need
different sampling techniques.  Many diseases cause infected animals to
become listless and not feed, so less likely to be caught in traps. On
the other hand, some parasites affect the nervous system and cause
affected animals to expose themselves to predation.

If only life was like an urn with fixed number of black and white balls
to sample ...

Allan 

-----Original Message-----
From: A UK-based worldwide e-mail broadcast system mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Senn
Sent: 27 June 2011 15:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Volunteer bias / non-response bias

Your assessment seems makes sense to me. I would say that the one
describes the individuals you see and the other those you don't but they
are, as you say, two sides of the same coin.
Stephen


Stephen Senn

Professor of Statistics
School of Mathematics and Statistics
Direct line: +44 (0)141 330 5141
Fax: +44 (0)141 330 4814
Private Webpage: http://www.senns.demon.co.uk/home.html

University of Glasgow
15 University Gardens
Glasgow G12 8QW

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
________________________________________
From: A UK-based worldwide e-mail broadcast system mailing list
[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dr Philip Sedgwick
[[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 27 June 2011 15:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Volunteer bias / non-response bias

Dear fellow Allstaters

Was wondering if anyone has an opinion on the definitions of volunteer
bias and non-response bias, especially in context of questionnaire
surveys. There is some potential overlap but I do not believe that one
is a simple inverse of the other.
Any thoughts
Best wishes
Philip Sedgwick

__________________________________________
Dr. Philip Sedgwick
Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics,
Academic Lead and Chief Examiner for SSCs and Projects
Section of Medical and Healthcare Education,
Room 6.30, Sixth Floor, Hunter Wing
St. George's, University of London,
London SW17 0RE
Telephone +44 20 8725 5551
Fax +44 20 8725 3584
Email [log in to unmask]
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Statistics_Man


You may leave the list at any time by sending the command

SIGNOFF allstat

to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.

You may leave the list at any time by sending the command

SIGNOFF allstat

to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.
This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only. Its unauthorised use, distribution, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and notify the sender. In messages of a non-business nature, the views and opinions expressed are the author's own
and do not necessarily reflect those of Cefas. 
Communications on Cefas’ computer systems may be monitored and/or recorded to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes.

You may leave the list at any time by sending the command

SIGNOFF allstat

to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.