Print

Print


Hi Donald,
Not sure if I follow your suggestion either.  If gender is a degenerate
regressor in a repeated measures design, then isn't the interaction of
gender with any other factors degenerate as well?

cheers,
-MH

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 19:56 +0200, Alexander Olsen wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion Donald. How would you go about to set up the 
> design martrix (in FEAT) in this case?
> 
> 
> MCLAREN, Donald wrote:
> > I'd agree on the age part since its likely everyone is a different 
> > age; however, I'd add gender as a covariate and make it interact with 
> > the repeated measure (essentially coding it as the covariate and also 
> > as the covariate*each measure). This would allow you to investigate 
> > any gender*measure interactions.
> >
> > Best Regards, Donald McLaren
> > =================
> > D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
> > Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
> > Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General 
> > Hospital and Harvard Medical School
> > Office: (773) 406-2464
> > =====================
> > This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain 
> > PROTECTED HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED 
> > and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
> > named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient 
> > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of 
> > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, 
> > disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
> > contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be 
> > unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please 
> > immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773) 406-2464 or email.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Alexander Olsen 
> > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Michael,
> >     Thank you so much for helping me. So that means that I should set
> >     up the design matrices without any covariates for age and gender?
> >
> >     cheers,
> >     Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> >     Michael Harms wrote:
> >
> >         Hi Alexander,
> >         Given that you are modeling the mean of each subject using a
> >         repeated
> >         measures design, that mean already incorporates that subject's
> >         age and
> >         gender as part of its estimate.  That is, if you added EVs for age
> >         and/or gender, those EVs can be represented as a linear
> >         combination of
> >         the columns modeling each subject's overall mean, and thus you
> >         would get
> >         a degenerate design matrix.  (This wouldn't strictly be true
> >         for age IF
> >         the value you used for age differed across the repeated scans of a
> >         subject, but unless your scans were spaced far apart
> >         temporally, you
> >         still might get a poorly conditioned design matrix).
> >
> >         cheers,
> >         -MH
> >
> >         On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 01:12 +0100, Alexander Olsen wrote:
> >          
> >
> >             Dear FLS experts,  I'm struggling a bit with setting up my
> >             analysis. What I would like to do is a repeated measures
> >             design with four timepoints, as in this example:
> >             http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/feat5/detail.html#ANOVA1factor4levelsRepeatedMeasures
> >
> >             However, I would also like to add age and gender as
> >             covariates in order to "remove" these effects. I hope
> >             anyone can help me, or direct me to an example which
> >             describes this.
> >             Thank you so much in advance.
> >             Alexander
> >                
> >
> >