Dear Mark
Thanks for bringing it to the attention of all of us. I am not sure they can
make any changes to a primary legislation with out full parliamentary
scrutiny. Perhaps a Parliamentarian or a Constitutional Lawyer in the net
work should inform us all.
BW
Anil
It appears to me to be knee jerk reaction by an administration which is
failing the country on multiple fronts particularly on economy and health (
look at shambolic health reforms)
Tell us what you think should happen to this Act and why, being specific
where possible:
* Should they be scrapped altogether?
Not at all, rather the Equality Act should be further strengthened
* Can they be merged with existing regulations?
No we need to keep this as a specific primary legislation
* Can we simplify them – or reduce the bureaucracy associated with them?
The Act is very clear and and if principles of equality are followed then
there is no red tape.
* Have you got any ideas to make these regulations better?
We should strengthened the Act on the bases of developing Case law to
further ensure that all citizens are treated equally
* Do you think they should be left as they are?
Periodic Amendments to strengthened on the basis of developing case law.
Prof Anil Jain MB BS, MD, FRCR, PG Dip (Medical Law)
Consultant Radiologist
Dept of Radiology and The Nightingale Centre & Genesis Prevention Centre
University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
Southmoor Road
Wythenshawe
M23 9LT
Tel: +44(0)161-291-4475
Fax: +44(0)161-291-6201
Mobile: 07711919881
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer:
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage,
disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply
function and then permanently delete what you have received.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Mark Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Colleagues may have seen some correspondence about the Red Tape Challenge
> - thanks to those who spotted this hazard. In case others did not open the
> pdf file, I'm taking the executive decision to recirculate this in the full
> text message below, as I feel this is too important to risk being left
> unread! Please pass it on!
>
> Mark R D Johnson
> Director, MSRC/CEEHD
> De Montfort University
> Moderator, [log in to unmask]
>
>
> *DO YOU SUPPORT THE EQUALITY ACT 2010? IF SO **– **SAY SO! The Redtape
> Challenge website **– **action required *The Government’s Redtape website
> was launched last week –
>
>
>
> www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/equalities/
>
>
>
>
>
> There you will read the following:
>
>
>
> Equality regulations are designed to help ensure fairness in the workplace
> and in wider society. They include regulations and laws on discrimination
> and harassment.
>
> You can find the Equality Act 2010 here<http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents>
>
> Tell us what you think should happen to this Act and why, being specific
> where possible:
>
> · Should they be scrapped altogether?
>
> · Can they be merged with existing regulations?
>
> · Can we simplify them – or reduce the bureaucracy associated
> with them?
>
> · Have you got any ideas to make these regulations better?
>
> · Do you think they should be left as they are?
>
>
>
> This website is supposed to allow people the opportunity to comment on unnecessary
> regulations. However the approach taken in relation to the Equality Act
> 2010 is different from the approach taken to all the other areas currently
> under consideration in that, instead of referring to specific regulations,
> the website appears to invite people to comment on the Equality Act 2010
> itself and whether it should be scrapped. Unsurprisingly although there are
> some excellent responses that make it clear that the Equality Act is primary
> legislation and not a series of regulations, there are also uninformed and
> hostile responses.
>
>
>
> *What needs to be done **– **URGENTLY *· Go to the website and write your
> views on the Equality Act; · encourage others to respond before the end of
> what may be a two week deadline (see process information) – looks like the
> deadline for comments could be Wednesday, 20/4/11; · ask people to note
> that the Equality Act is primary legislation not a regulation; · ask
> people to highlight how improper this process is, given that ostensibly
> people are being asked to comment about regulations but the entire Equality
> Act 2010 appears to have been put up for grabs; · ask people to comment
> positively about the Act and the regulations.
>
>
>
> Thanks to the Discrimination Law Association and Jennifer Downie (a MEH
> jiscmail group member) for alerting us to this!
>
>
>
>
