Useful to know that consultation has had
an impact. Democracy in action! Thanks for your assessment Jo.
Please remember to respond to the
curriculum review. GEM has contributed to the Cultural Learning Alliance submission
that you can base your own response on: http://www.culturallearningalliance.org.uk/uncategorized/champion-the-arts-and-culture-within-the-curriculum-review-%e2%80%93-respond-today
Deadline to submit is the 14th April.
I’m encouraging parents I know to
respond just by ticking the boxes online to say they want to keep the breadth
of the curriculum which will take minutes, although I think we as a sector
should have something to say about the way our subjects are taught.
Sam
Samantha
Area Engagement Advisor, London Field Team
Museums Libraries & Archives Council
T: +44 (0)7768 803327
www.mla.gov.uk
From:
List for discussion of issues in museum education in the UK.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jo
Graham
Sent: 05 April 2011 08:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EYFS review
Dear all
Following
on from
The
government were clearly hoping that the review would abandon the EYFS or change
it so much as to make it unrecognisable. Certainly all the signs pointed
to a hope that it would not remain applicable to all EYs settings. However, in
what is largely being welcomed by the sector as a balanced report, the EYFS
remains and is still a universal framework (although independent schools can
opt out).
Indeed,
the consultation showed that when questioned on their views of the EYFS, the
vast majority (72 per cent) thought the EYFS was successful. And when
questioned about the value of areas of learning, 82 per cent thought they
provided an effective structure for young children’s learning.
There is
enough slimming down of paper work to enable government ministers to say
they've achieved their goal and the rearranging of the areas of learning
into layers, looks like a slimming down too. 30 per cent of those who
responded to the call for overall views on EYFS felt there is too much
bureaucracy and paperwork. Hardly an overwhelming condemnation, although
clearly an area to address. The report's slimmed down assessment framework
certainly looks more sensible.
The
focus on three key areas of skills for learning (PHSE, communication and
physical) is broadly welcomed and especially the de-coupling of literacy from
language and communication, which will enable a greater emphasis on speaking
and listening at this vital stage.
Overall,
not as much change as feared and a demonstration of sector consultation having
some effect.
The
opening remarks of the report set the tone:
"It
has been apparent from the start of the review that the EYFS has had a positive
overall impact on children in early years settings.There is strong evidence
from those with an interest, whether as parents or carers or professionals
working in the field, that they like the approach and it is encouraging good
reflective practice.The EYFS was deliberately designed to be an inclusive
framework, pulling together a number of different approaches within early
years. As such, it has managed what might have seemed impossible, namely the
active participation from a wide and varied group of early years practitioners.
Significantly, it is also very much valued by parents who appreciate the
support their children receive, and the information it gives about their
child’s progress; parents are reassured by the regulatory framework that
sits behind the EYFS.
However, although there
is strong support for the EYFS, it is not perfect and there are clear areas
where it can be improved. It was right to review the original very broad
approach taken in the EYFS, and there are important ways in which the framework
can be strengthened and simplified. "
Read on, if you have a
moment.
Best
Jo
Jo Graham
Learning Unlimited
Ringwood
Hants
BH24 1SP
t: 01425
479438
m: 07970 062077
Care is taken to minimize the risk of
virus transfer but Learning Unlimited cannot accept liability for any adverse
consequences arising from this email or any attachments to it. This email may
contain confidential material - if you receive it by mistake please return to
sender and delete it from your system. Thank you!