 |
 |
Useful to know that consultation has had an impact. Democracy in action! Thanks for your assessment Jo. Please remember to respond to the curriculum review. GEM has contributed to the Cultural Learning Alliance submission that you can base your own response on: http://www.culturallearningalliance.org.uk/uncategorized/champion-the-ar ts-and-culture-within-the-curriculum-review-%e2%80%93-respond-today Deadline to submit is the 14th April. I'm encouraging parents I know to respond just by ticking the boxes online to say they want to keep the breadth of the curriculum which will take minutes, although I think we as a sector should have something to say about the way our subjects are taught. Sam Samantha Cairns Area Engagement Advisor, London Field Team Museums Libraries & Archives Council T: +44 (0)7768 803327 [log in to unmask] www.mla.gov.uk _____ From: List for discussion of issues in museum education in the UK. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jo Graham Sent: 05 April 2011 08:53 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: EYFS review Dear all Following on from Sharon's email flagging up the report, you can download it at http://www.education.gov.uk/tickellreview <http://www.education.gov.uk/tickellreview> The government were clearly hoping that the review would abandon the EYFS or change it so much as to make it unrecognisable. Certainly all the signs pointed to a hope that it would not remain applicable to all EYs settings. However, in what is largely being welcomed by the sector as a balanced report, the EYFS remains and is still a universal framework (although independent schools can opt out). Indeed, the consultation showed that when questioned on their views of the EYFS, the vast majority (72 per cent) thought the EYFS was successful. And when questioned about the value of areas of learning, 82 per cent thought they provided an effective structure for young children's learning. There is enough slimming down of paper work to enable government ministers to say they've achieved their goal and the rearranging of the areas of learning into layers, looks like a slimming down too. 30 per cent of those who responded to the call for overall views on EYFS felt there is too much bureaucracy and paperwork. Hardly an overwhelming condemnation, although clearly an area to address. The report's slimmed down assessment framework certainly looks more sensible. The focus on three key areas of skills for learning (PHSE, communication and physical) is broadly welcomed and especially the de-coupling of literacy from language and communication, which will enable a greater emphasis on speaking and listening at this vital stage. Overall, not as much change as feared and a demonstration of sector consultation having some effect. The opening remarks of the report set the tone: "It has been apparent from the start of the review that the EYFS has had a positive overall impact on children in early years settings.There is strong evidence from those with an interest, whether as parents or carers or professionals working in the field, that they like the approach and it is encouraging good reflective practice.The EYFS was deliberately designed to be an inclusive framework, pulling together a number of different approaches within early years. As such, it has managed what might have seemed impossible, namely the active participation from a wide and varied group of early years practitioners. Significantly, it is also very much valued by parents who appreciate the support their children receive, and the information it gives about their child's progress; parents are reassured by the regulatory framework that sits behind the EYFS. However, although there is strong support for the EYFS, it is not perfect and there are clear areas where it can be improved. It was right to review the original very broad approach taken in the EYFS, and there are important ways in which the framework can be strengthened and simplified. " Read on, if you have a moment. Best Jo Jo Graham Learning Unlimited 22 North Poulner Road Ringwood Hants BH24 1SP t: 01425 479438 m: 07970 062077 Care is taken to minimize the risk of virus transfer but Learning Unlimited cannot accept liability for any adverse consequences arising from this email or any attachments to it. This email may contain confidential material - if you receive it by mistake please return to sender and delete it from your system. Thank you! + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + GEM list: Contact the list owner for assistance at [log in to unmask] For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=GEM + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ______________________________________________________________________ Unless stated otherwise the information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. It is intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council is a Company Limited by Guarantee, Registered in England, with Company Number 03888251. The Registered Office being : Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, (MLA) Grosvenor House, 14 Bennett's Hill, Birmingham, B2 5RS. Registered Charity number : 1079666. ______________________________________________________________________ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + GEM list: Contact the list owner for assistance at [log in to unmask] For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=GEM + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +