 |
 |
Dear Karthik and Sergei, Thank you for the replies (helpful and humorous). Karthik, I confirmed that the chain breaks in my .PDB have TER cards, but I arrive at the same result. Perhaps "dark matter" is to blame for this "singularity" after all... In that case, maybe I just need to try again tomorrow. I'll post the solution if I find it before moving on. Regards, -Andy -----Original Message----- From: S. Karthikeyan [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:21 AM To: Andrew T. Torelli Cc: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] SFCHECK produces incomplete postscript If you have break in the protein chain, this problem will occur. Put "TER" card in the PDB file where ever the chain break is there, then run SFCHECK. The .ps output now will be complete and should be able to see in the viewer. HTH -Karthik > Dear all, > > I have been trying to compare a model that I'm refining against the native SFs > using SFCHECK. SFCHECK finishes normally (no errors in log file, seemingly > complete list of output .ps files), but produces a postscript file with only > the first page of output (and it is mostly blank). There is the typical > light-grey panels on a dark-grey background format that I'm used to for SFCHECK > postscript files, but there are no figures or data. Also, my mouse icon > indicates it is "hung" trying to load/read the file (i.e. it's a moving "busy" > icon under Linux). > > I've tried other postscript viewers without luck. I can successfully run > SFCHECK on a completely different model/MTZ pair without problem though. So > does anyone know of circumstances that would lead to a "hung" postscript file > from SFCHECK? > > Thanks for your help, > -Andy > > >