 |
 |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Sam Hartman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > O, well, I was hoping this would be easy. It is easy: you do the minimum that you must do _now_ and leave complexity for later. Unless you have an immediate need for that complexity such that you can't push it off, this approach works fine, and it's less risky than the alternative. Nico --