Print

Print


 Jesper Aagaard Petersen wrote:

Yeah to that : )
Although with such a pedigree its easy to see why it might take a while for the message to get through : )

Btw - to take this at a tangent - in Stephen Flower's excellent book "Hermetic Magick" - p14
he states his postmodern thesis :
"Furthermore the post-modernist is free of the contraints of modern progressivism: To the modern if it's not new ,
if its not the latest thing, then it is "retrograde" or "reactionary" and hence unacceptable.
Post modernists are free to synthesis elements from all phases of human history - _in any shape or form that suits their purpose_."

True or false?

Mogg




[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
Mogg,
 
Ah, that might be the problem here... Things have cleaned up or more precisely exploded since the 1980s. The field of Satanism is much more heterogenous and diverse today. Grahams article (1995) and my anthology (2009) are good places to start.
 
I definitely do not say that links are non-existent - and some were (or are) high profile: Your ToS example, some of LaVey's acquaintances in the 1970s and 80s (and his own writings in the 1980s), LaVey's and Aquino's enduring interest in Nazi occulture, Boyd Rice, Nikolas and Zeena Schreck in the 1980s... the apocalypse culture of Feral House, ONA's right wing esotericism etc etc. But they cannot determine the field as a whole, not then and certainly not now. And they have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis; some are tongue in cheek, some are deadly serious, some are inflammatory rhetoric, some are translated into political action (and being an organizer of BNF is pretty obvious). As with asatru or Islam, for example, Satanism is not just one thing and cannot be defined by one group.
 
Perhaps the best analogy is with heathenism and asatru; some are racists, some are "racialist", some are left-wing pluralists and some don't care one whiff about politics.
 
Best,
 
Jesper.


From: Society for The Academic Study of Magic [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of mandrake
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] CFP: Satanism conference (Stockholm University, Sweden, Sept 25-27, 2011)

Jesper

It definitely requires careful wording / research - of course I agree that there are
" Satanists who combine socialism and Satanism, anarchism and Satanism - and a lot are totally apolitical and couldn't care less."
But there are also the opposite - ie right wing/neofascist types with an interest in
satanism - many of whom are quite high profile.

It could well be that things have been cleaned up some since the worse excesses of the 1980s -
i'll have to reread Graham's article to see what he says -
but it surely cannot have escaped your notice that the one time UK head of
TOS was also reputed to be an organiser for
the British National Front? So it must be there in the literature somewhere ?

I really hope you're right about it being a minority but sometimes
I get a bit worn down when I see some Setians wearing nazi regalia and with extremist views -
 


Mogg