 |
 |
On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Peter W. Draper wrote: >> >> Thanks. Sticking with a fork of blt2.x seems like a good plan. > > Since we're switching vendors it makes sense to start from clean sources, > so maybe a new git repositort for BLT is required (wizeblt.git?). Agree? > Want to create one? Sounds reasonable. I'll import the source. -- Tim Jenness Joint Astronomy Centre