 |
 |
if it was me i would just reprocess the data. still, if its the same for all subjects it probably just means the last 2 slices were not included, which means that you just won't have data for those slices, but the rest of the brain data should be fine. cheers, michael On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Ti Da <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Sorry, I intended to acquire 32 slices and I collecetd 32 slices for all > my participants. It is just a typo that I have in my scripts where I state > in my scripts that I have 30 instead of 32 slices. I had presumed that if my > scripst we not compatiable with my data that they would not run and that an > error message would come up but this was not the case, so I am worried that > my analysis results are innacurate as this typo occured early in the > analysis that it will affect end result. Let me know if I still have not > explained myself. > > Tim > ------------------------------ > From: [log in to unmask] > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:07:08 -0800 > Subject: Re: [SPM] number of slices-analysis > To: [log in to unmask] > CC: [log in to unmask] > > > you should give more details. Do you mean you accidentally acquired 30 > instead of 32 for some people, or 32 was acquired but you only ended up with > 30. if the latter, at what stage did it occur? you can't really expect help > without giving at least a minimal amount of info. > > Cheers, > Michael > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ti Da <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi > > I have run an analysis on SPM 8 using scripts. Everything worked > successfully. I checked back on my script and noticed that instead of having > 32 slices I have 30 slices. Everything else is correct (TR etc.) What > implicatiosn does this have for my results. Would I have to redo everything? > > Tim > > > > > -- > Research Associate > Gazzaley Lab > Department of Neurology > University of California, San Francisco > -- Research Associate Gazzaley Lab Department of Neurology University of California, San Francisco