Hi All,
I have also noticed that the DCM10 model estimation process is taking _significantly_ longer to complete as compared to that run in the earlier SPM version. This is the case even with a relatively simple model (with only 2 VOIs). Has anyone else noticed this issue? Can anything be done to improve the processing speed?
Thanks,
Emily Parks
Dear DCMers,
I played a little bit around with DCM10, and found considerable difference compared to earlier versions of DCM when estimating an identical 6 regions motor network model. For example, connections which were strongly negative in the "old DCM" version (DCM.Ep) were strongly positive in DCM10 (1-state, bilinear, no stochastic). If I run more complex models in DCM10, it takes 6 (!) times longer than in earlier SPM8 versions...Coupling estimates in DCM10 are sometimes unusually big (close to 1.0). Is there any way to compare "old DCMs" with "new DCMs" to get a feeling of what has changed (and more importantly: what is correct)?
Best regards,
Christian
--------------------------------------------------
Dr. med. Christian Grefkes
Zentrum für Neurologie und Psychiatrie
Universität zu Köln
Kerpener Straße 62, 50924 Köln
phone: +49-221-4726-310
fax: +49-221-478-7005
http://neurologie-psychiatrie.uk-koeln.de/
Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research
Research Group Leader
Neuromodulation & Neurorehabilitation
Gleueler Str. 50, 50931 Köln
phone: +49-221-4726-310
fax: +49-221-4726-298
http://www.nf.mpg.de/index.php?id=255