 |
 |
Any tips for ICE jobs in a similar state on WMS? Catalin > -----Original Message----- > From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > On Behalf Of Maarten Litmaath > Sent: 24 November 2010 17:40 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] condor jobs in WMS > > Hola Arnau, > > > We have many jobs in H status in our WMS. Most of them are really > old: > > > > 184308.0 glite 4/27 21:26 0+00:00:00 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 197405.0 glite 5/11 22:18 1+17:25:59 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198019.0 glite 5/12 15:37 0+20:36:19 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198058.0 glite 5/12 15:42 1+03:51:48 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198190.0 glite 5/12 15:55 1+10:48:08 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198536.0 glite 5/12 16:33 0+23:34:50 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198598.0 glite 5/12 16:36 0+18:43:36 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 198770.0 glite 5/12 16:55 0+21:51:36 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 200168.0 glite 5/13 08:44 0+00:00:00 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 214206.0 glite 5/27 00:59 0+00:00:00 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > 214507.0 glite 5/27 10:48 0+00:00:00 H 0 9.8 > JobWrapper.https_3 > > [...] > > > > > > Shouldn't be deleted by any wms process? if not, may I delete them > by > > hand? > > # condor_q|grep -c H > > 997 > > That is nothing; some of our WMS had >15k before we did some cleanup. > A solution is provided in this bug report: > > https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/index.php?70401