Print

Print


On Oct 3, 2010, at 4:06 AM, Hiu Chan wrote:

> I agree with Doung.
> Demoncracy is not suitable for every country/society.
> China needed communism to stay in control especially after the  
> Culture Revolution.
>
Doug wrote:
> >
> > Or some other strong central government, of course. It's not the
> > communism that holds it together.


Actually, Hiu, just to be clear, I said it needed a strong central  
government.
The strong central government that held it together, including through  
the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, needn't have been communist,  
merely strong.
That's been China's historical SOP for millennia, whether the  
authoritarian government has been animist or confucian, warlord or  
communist, it's always centripetal.  And I think you're right,  
freedoms will lead to China breaking apart somewhat.  It may not lose  
actual territory but the relationship between Beijing and, say, the  
far western turkic minorities will loosen.

And 'too much freedom' will 'work' one way, 'too little' will 'work'  
another way, don't you think?  Unless, of course, your only goal for  
'working' is keeping China together in its current geographical and  
political configuration.  In that case, only very limited freedoms  
will work.

So very easy to predict the future when there's nothing at stake for  
me.  Please take all this as armchair history, Hiu, not as ideological  
assertions.

Very cordially,
Doug

Doug vanderHoof
Producer
Modern Media
773-394-0029
Bucktown, Chicago+Seattle

http://Modern-media.com
Skype:  dvanderhoof
Personal blog:  Tellingdetails.blogspot.com


*
*
Film-Philosophy
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For technical help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**