Print

Print


Please, Dave. And let me have the link so I can join too.
Mikel

On 13 October 2010 10:34, David Green <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  Mikel,
>
> Would you like me to post this on the new academic myth list ... cannot
> remember if you are on there ... but you should be x
>
>
> Dr Dave Green
>
> Senior Lecturer in Sociology, University of the West of England, Bristol,
> UK
>
> Society for the Academic Study of Magic (SASM):
>
> *http://www.sasm.co.uk* <http://www.sasm.co.uk/>
>
> I shall be telling this with a sigh
>
> Somewhere ages and ages hence:
>
> Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
>
> I took the one less traveled by,
>
> And that has made all the difference.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Society for The Academic Study of Magic [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Mikel Koven
> *Sent:* 13 October 2010 08:44
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] Fwd: CFP: Global Mythologies and World
> Cinemas (edited collection)
>
>   Apologies for cross posting ...
>
> *
> *
>
> *Global Mythology and World Cinema*
>
> A proposed edited collection by Mikel J. Koven (University of Worcester)
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> *Global Mythology and World Cinema* will be a collection of essays which
> discuss how a variety of world cinemas use their own indigenous cultural
> mythologies. The *function* of these myths and their filmic counterparts
> will vary from culture-to-culture and from film-to-film. The collection will
> argue against the extant paradigm of “mythic cinema”, wherein the term
> “myth,” co-opted by Jungians and Campbellians, refers to any vague perceived
> universal archetype.  This collection will be about cultural specificity,
> not universal generalizations, regarding the sacred and how that sacred is
> manifested in world cinema.
>
>
>
> In terms of a definition of “myth”, *Global Mythology and World Cinema*begins with William Bascom’s 1965 definition (in “The Forms of Folklore:
> Prose Narratives” in *Journal of American Folklore* 78: 3-20) and builds
> from there. Bascom defined myths as “prose narratives which, in the society
> in which they are told, are considered to be truthful accounts of what
> happened in the remote past”. Bascom continues,
>
>  They are accepted on faith; they are taught to be believed; and they can
> be cited as authority in answer to ignorance, doubt, or disbelief. Myths are
> the embodiment of dogma; they are usually sacred; and they are often
> associated with theology and ritual. Their main characters are not usually
> human beings, but they often have human attributes; they are animals,
> deities, or culture heroes, whose actions are set in an earlier world, when
> the earth was different from what it is today, or in another world such as
> the sky or underworld. (4)
>
> While *Global Mythology and World Cinema* will not be limited to Bascom’s
> definition, we use it here to make that distinction between the current
> project and how other scholars have used the word “myth”, often in the same
> generalized and universalized way that Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell have.
> This current project seeks to rescue the genre from its use to refer to
> (imagined) archetypes, and welcomes opportunities to bridge the
> anthropological and folkloric definitions with more cultural studies
> approaches (i.e. Levi-Strauss and Barthes).
>
>
>
> We seek in-depth papers (approximately between 8000-10, 000 words)
> exploring the indigenous mythic visions from the following cultural groups’
> cinemas:
>
> ·         Japanese cinema
>
> ·         Chinese cinema
>
> ·         Korean cinema
>
> ·         Polynesian and South East Asian cinemas
>
> ·         Oceanic cinemas (i.e. Maori and Australian Aborigine)
>
> ·         Indian cinemas
>
> ·         African cinemas (from many regions and groups)
>
> ·         Middle-Eastern and Arab cinemas
>
> ·         and the cinemas and mythologies of Native Ameicans
>
> Other topics may also be suggested; the above list is intended as
> illustrative, not definitive.
>
>
>
> While an academic publisher has been approached, and interest in the
> collection has been expressed, we are not yet at the stage to request
> abstracts: We are currently looking for statements of “interest”.
>
>
>
> If you have an idea which you would like to be considered for inclusion in
> this book, please email Mikel J. Koven ([log in to unmask]) with a brief
> (informal) description of what you would like to write on by 31 October
> 2010. The deadline for formal abstracts (200-words) will be a few months
> later, and final papers would not need to be submitted until January 2012.
>
> --
> Mikel J. Koven
> Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> - Juvenal (Satires VI)
>
>
> --
> Mikel J. Koven
> Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> - Juvenal (Satires VI)
>



-- 
Mikel J. Koven
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
- Juvenal (Satires VI)