According to press report, the dog went missing in 2007 - it is now nearly 2011.
Dog company could disclose details of the 2007 owner to 2010 owner very easily (e.g. with consent) to allow them to sort out the ownership issue. If both are reasonable people they can resolve "what is in the best interest of the dog?".
This is so obvious that it is reasonable to assume it has been done. If so, there is something else (not reported) which is going on in the background.
Also is it a data protection issue? Surely the focus of the data is the dog? Perhaps you would like to discuss this on our next set of DP courses starting in Manchester at the end of the month (places still available).
Forgive the cunning and devious way of getting an advert in - but others do it all the time!
Dr. C. N. M. Pounder
Director, Amberhawk Training Ltd
Phone: 0845 680 2623 or Mob: 07735 365 585
www.amberhawk.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
