Again you should read the spectacular paper by Obmolova and co. where they solved the structures of three Fab-antigen complexes using “MMS” microseeding (seeding into random screens), starting with one hit containing clusters of needles - which could not themselves be optimized
The paper is available on open access (free)
http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2010/08/00/issconts.html
http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2010/08/00/bw5361/bw5361.pdf
Acta Cryst. (2010). D66, 927-933 [ doi:10.1107/S0907444910026041 ]
Promoting crystallization of antibody-antigen complexes via microseed matrix screening
G. Obmolova, T. J. Malia, A. Teplyakov, R. Sweet and G. L. Gilliland
Synopsis: The application of microseed matrix screening to the crystallization of related antibodies in complex with IL-13 is described. Both self-seeding or cross-seeding helped promote nucleation and increase the hit rate.
Online 14 July 2010
The application of microseed matrix screening to the crystallization
of antibody–antigen complexes is described for a set
of antibodies that include mouse anti-IL-13 antibody C836, its
humanized version H2L6 and an affinity-matured variant of
H2L6, M1295. The Fab fragments of these antibodies were
crystallized in complex with the antigen human IL-13. The
initial crystallization screening for each of the three complexes
included 192 conditions. Only one hit was observed for H2L6
and none were observed for the other two complexes. Matrix
self-microseeding using these microcrystals yielded multiple
hits under various conditions that were further optimized to
grow diffraction-quality H2L6 crystals. The same H2L6 seeds
were also successfully used to promote crystallization of the
other two complexes. The M1295 crystals appeared to be
isomorphous to those of H2L6, whereas the C836 crystals were
in a different crystal form. These results are consistent with the
concept that the conditions that are best for crystal growth
may be different from those that favor nucleation. Microseed
matrix screening using either a self-seeding or cross-seeding
approach proved to be a fast, robust and reliable method not
only for the refinement of crystallization conditions but also to
promote crystal nucleation and increase the hit rate.
--
For information and discussion about protein crystallization and automation, please join
our bulletin board at http://groups-beta.google.com/group/oryx_group?hl=en
[log in to unmask] Douglas Instruments Ltd.
DouglasHouse, EastGarston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG177HD, UK
Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart
Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090 US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of xaravich ivan
Sent: 10 September 2010 04:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Fab purification and crystallization
Hi CCP4bb,
I have two questions regarding Fab purification and Fab-antigen complex crystallization and would really appreciate any input from the experienced board.
1) I have got some hits for Fab-antigen complex (150 kD) but they are all needle clusters. Whatever fine screen I formulate, it always gives me these needle clusters. Are there some better common ways to change needles to single crystals?
2) I have certain IgGs from which I purify the Fab by papain digestion (resin from ThermoSci). One of the first steps is to dialyze the IgG with the digestion buffer,( 20mM Na-phosphate and 10mM EDTA pH 7.0) Over night. I always get 30-60% of the IgG precipitated during this overnight dialysis. I tried to increase the salt by adding 200mM NaCl but of no effect. Have anyone experienced such problem? Is there any thing that could be tried to stop this precipitation.
thanks in advance.
ivan