Hm. I wonder just how many IT professionals are reading this list, let alone contributing.
It's often the same people every time.
I think to suggest that forums are somehow less productive, and lead only to closed discussions is misguided. Sorry.
I'm reminded so much of conversations in the workplace...  
"But we've always done it this way. It works for me. Why do you have to change it?"

 

Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:39:34 +0100
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: RM forums was Re: [RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK] Recent metoo responses to sharepoint
To: [log in to unmask]

Before this gets out of hand – this is a totally open list and anyone can join, just like it’s US equivalent.  The list owners happen to be RMS people but it’s not an RMS list.  Lots of vendors and people who would not describe themselves as records managers subscribe and contribute, though there are rules about overt commercial activity.  There are a couple of closed specialist group lists.  Archives-NRA is also an open list. 

 

Closed discussion forums (fora?) just lead to closed discussions and the blind lead the blind. If you’re not interested in a topic then the delete key works wonders but most of the best discoveries come from good old serendipity.

 

I confess I find the ‘me toos’ infuriating, particularly when David Bridge had already invited people to communicate with him directly about a possible Sharepoint group.

 

Incidentally Microsoft’s marketing guys must be absolutely delighted at the thought of groups like this.  I know little about the current product.  However, in classic MS fashion they appear to have a product which, according to people whose opinion I value, doesn’t do exactly what you want it do but does lots of other things for which it’s difficult to find an immediate use.  IT people buy it because, as in the old IBM days, no-one gets fired for buying Microsoft and then loads of other people get together to find work rounds for functionality that MS sort of includes, at least by name - but not quite.

 

Thank goodness I don’t have to be concerned about it anymore.

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]

--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RM forums was Re: [RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK] Recent metoo responses to sharepoint
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:32:04 +0100



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jen Parker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
By RM specific forum, i just meant one that is more aimed at specifically helping Records Managers ... 

But yes, it's another limitation of this listserv that we're not opening up the dialogue to the people Matt mentions. 

interesting because the US counterpart to this list (recmgmt-l) is open to all vendors and practitioners, attorneys, archivists, IT folks no restriction as to who can join and participate lots of good discussions over there
http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=RECMGMT-L

we have over 2000 subscribers at that list. and lots of good discussions

 
After all, we really could do with the publicity.
 
(I still remember finding about this listserv purely by chance, and i'd been working with records for a few years by that point) 
 
Jen Parker

--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask] For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask] For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]