Print

Print


Hi Folks

What a terrific conversation.  

 

I share Joan’s understanding of servant leadership – but confess to agreeing with Robyn’s assessment about the slippery nature of the terminology. From my perspective working and researching in the community sector there is a strong heroic agency alive and well, manifesting strongly in martyrs and warriors – both of whom burn out very quickly . My sense is that Greenleaf was keen to change the leadership paradigm in certain large and corporate organisations, but I have long worried about its interpretation in the community sector. Thanks Robyn for articulating this tension.

 

Warmly

Lynda

________________________________________________________________________________________

Dr Lynda Shevellar                                                       Student Mentor

            School of Social Work and Human Services                    Mondays & Tuesdays

            Room 307, Chamberlain Building (#35)                            [log in to unmask]

            Campbell Drive, St Lucia Campus                                   UQ ALLY

            University of Queensland, Qld, 4072                    Research Fellow

            Ph. 07 3365 2952                                                           Wednesdays & Thursdays

            Fax. 07 3365 1788                                                         Small Loans Project

            Email: [log in to unmask]                              Course Coordinator

                                                                                                Community Development Unit

 

 

 

 

 

From: Practitioner-Researcher [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joan Walton
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Brief thoughts on Servant Leadership

 

Dear Robyn, Alan and All

My understanding of Servant Leadership (also based on the writings of Robert Greenleaf, who was interested in the management of large organisations) was that he was challenging the idea of leadership as being hierarchical and / or 'leading from the front' - but rather organisations would work better if people were operating on the basis that they were serving each other.  This led to more collaborative practices, good team working etc. 

So rather than seeing the leader as a servant, I think he was trying to encourage everyone to see themselves as serving - and then ask themselves that in serving, what leadership role they could play....

Joan

On 2 August 2010 21:43, Alan Markowitz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear Robyn et al,

 

The concept of Servant Leadership goes far beyond servitude. The thought that you may give up serving to assume leadership is far off of the mark of this paradigm. As our institution is training leaders in all aspects of education, we encourage them to invert the hierarchical pyramid so that the leader is now in a position to see and assist all of the others in the organization in moving it forward. I again encourage people to review the work of Robert Greenleaf and Larry Spears. There is now an international network on Servant Leadership that is actively growing.. Asking oneself what I can do to improve what I do may be facilitated through the lense of Servant Leadership. Servant Leadership, in fact, encourages self- reflection within your own contextual set of relationships.
I look forward to the possibility of further dialogue

 

 

Dr. Alan Markowitz
Director, Graduate Programs in Education

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Robyn Pound <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear All

 

I find this an interesting discussion but may have missed some important aspects of it and I am happy to be corrected.

 

When I saw the title Servant Leadership I reacted on an instinctual level (ie without words -a value mismatch -at first I was uncertain why )  A more thoughtful response - there is something undemocratic in the notion.  I thought of the number of people in caring professions who are already 'pleasers' and like to do everything for other people for all the reasons that we 'pleasers' do.  It is not necessarily very educational for the receiver if it perpetuates inequality.  I like the implied impulse to reduce power relationships and in my own research named my intention to start where the other people are is and go with them to the places they wanted to go.  This works in that it builds co operation and motivation and progress happens when the others feel their power to influence; can recognise themselves as legitimate knowers of stuff with control over their future. 

 

What it doesn't do is encourage the others (or me) to think about me and what my my role is in this dynamic.  This is still the biggie for me - how do I take responsibility in response to things I see in the other's behaviour? Where do the boundaries (sorry Alan Rayner) lie for what is me and what is you?  As a professional I might know things useful to the situation or I may need to act on behalf of someone less powerful (a child) against the others.   For this reason I found enquirying into my own practising by asking 'how can I improve what I am doing here?' such a help.  I was able to consider the expressed needs of the others in their context and my own motivations (values) and question them.  Where do my values come from?, Why are they important to me? Do I actually do as I claim, or wish to?  Why not?  This latter is where new sometimes competing values come to light and the complexity of democratic being where I can work at holding true to all of my values and confront the inappropriateness of being a 'pleaser' in my search to do my best for the others. 

I try not to be a scoundrel deliberately but I like the idea that it is human, impossible, to get things right all of the time.  It is therefore useful and important to me that I foster relationships with the people where there is room to move and imperfections in each of us can be tolerated.   We are living an aspect of our lives together as we all try to do life nearer to the way we believe it should be.

 

I don't know how much sense this makes but it was usefuk for me to think about why I no longer wish to be a servant in my leadership role.

 

I too feel emotional when I read the words of Lilla Watson's on my wall.

She said it for me:        

                         "If you've come to help us, we dont need your help.

                      But if you've come because your liberation is bound up

                                    with ours, then let us work together."

 

Robyn

 

 

 

 

 




--
Dr Joan Walton
Director of the Centre for the Child and Family

Faculty of Education
Liverpool Hope University
Hope Park
Liverpool
L16 9JD

Phone: 0151 291 2115
Email: [log in to unmask]