 |
 |
OK, then update to the latest version (4.1.6) and this should fix it. The old version was known to take a long time in some circumstances. All the best, Mark On 26 Aug 2010, at 15:05, McWhinney, Sean wrote: > I'm running 4.1.3 > ________________________________________ > From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf > Of Matthew Webster [[log in to unmask]] > Sent: August-26-10 11:02 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [FSL] Featquery never finishes > > Hello, > cat $FSLDIR/etc/fslversion > > will give you the full FSL version number. > > Many Regards > > Matthew > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for getting back to me. I'm running FSL 4.1 which appears to >> be the newest, and my structural images are 255x255x71 I believe. >> Is there a ballpark time I can expect invwarp to require? >> >> Sean >> ________________________________________ >> From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >> Of Mark Jenkinson [[log in to unmask]] >> Sent: August-26-10 10:55 AM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [FSL] Featquery never finishes >> >> Hi, >> >> Are you running the latest version of FSL? >> The invwarp command used to take a long >> time to run but should work more quickly now. >> What resolution are your structural images? >> That might have an impact too. >> >> All the best, >> Mark >> >> >> >> On 26 Aug 2010, at 14:30, Sean McWhinney wrote: >> >>> I'm quite new to fMRI analysis and so the data I'm currently working >>> with is my first experience with FSL. Simply put, attempting to run >>> Featquery on Feat directories with nonlinear registration seems to >>> cause it never to finish. A featquery directory is created with >>> report.log & html files, but the log file never gets farther than >>> "Found nonlinear warp field... Starting warp field inversion...". >>> Featquery never seems to progress beyond this point. Using 'top' >>> from terminal indicates that the invwarp process is in fact running, >>> and taking a large amount of CPU power, but it seems that this never >>> finishes regardless of how much time I give it. >>> >>> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated! >>> >> >