 |
 |
Hello, We have changed it so that the peak table shows the "proper" value (so not just the value in the fundamental region) so hopefully this all makes more sense now. Wayne On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Guillaume Communie wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the answer. > I agree for the number of points but it could be very useful to get the > frequency in Hertz (with the aliasing) from the peak list. That would avoid > to export the chemical shift in ppm and then make the conversion in Hz. > > G >