Hello Mathew,

I was reporting the console output and not the Lmax file. The Lmax file looks great; I am now seeing the correct numbers of local maxima.

Thanks a lot for your help!

Best regards

Alex


On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello,
          Interesting, this looks like output that should be written to the console, rather than the Lmax file - can you confirm the two are identical?

Many Regards

Matthew

Thanks  a lot, Mathew.

Here is part of the Lmax output that I get  in response to the cluster command: cluster -i N18_Kurth_dAI_g7_zfrm_avg.nii.gz -t .2 --mm -n 5 --connectivity=26 --olmax=Lmax

Cluster Index   Voxels  Z-MAX   Z-MAX X (mm)    Z-MAX Y (mm)    Z-MAX Z (mm)    Z-COG X (mm)    Z-COG Y (mm)    Z-COG Z (mm)
25      7471    2.19    36      20      0       41.6    22      8.69
24      4496    0.877   -32     18      4       -37.4   21.9    7.18
23      2754    0.524   6       12      46      4.32    13.7    43.5
22      2102    0.5     64      -28     30      59.1    -31.7   35.4
21      1374    0.439   -62     -32     26      -61.1   -31.9   30.7
......

Best
Alex

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,
     I am seeing the correct numbers of local Maxima reported in the Lmax file ( 5 entries for the bigger clusters ):

Cluster Index   Z       x       y       z       
25      2.19    36      20      0
25      0.546   52      10      0
25      0.504   36      46      30
25      0.344   44      50      16
25      0.331   42      4       34
24      0.877   -32     18      4
24      0.503   -36     40      30
24      0.32    -28     40      -12
24      0.293   -38     -8      -12
24      0.282   -52     8       10
<edit>

can you paste in the contents of your Lmax file so we can check for discrepancies?

Many Regards

Matthew


Hi Mathew,

I am sorry i meant -t .20 and not -t 2. Could you change the threshold and see what i am doing wrong here?

Thank you

Alex

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello,
          Thank you for the upload - it looks like your image only has a single cluster, comprised of 4 voxels, after thresholding - In this case cluster is only able to report one local maximum.

Many Regards

Matthew


Hi Matthew

Thanks for your response.

The six reference number for this upload session is 860510 .

Best

Alex

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,
    Can you upload your input image to:


and let me know the 6-digit reference number?

Many Regards

Matthew


Dear Fslers,

I am trying to use the cluster command to find peak coordinates within large clusters of functional connectivity maps. 

The command  that I am using is this:
cluster -i SWT_zfrm.avg.nii.gz -t 2 --mm -n 5 --connectivity=26 --olmax=Lmax

Instead of outputting 5 local maxima for each cluster, it only gives 1 as if the argument -n is being ignored.

Could you tell me what am I going wrong?

Thank you

Best
Alex