Print

Print


Hello Mathew,

I was reporting the console output and not the Lmax file. The Lmax file
looks great; I am now seeing the correct numbers of local maxima.

Thanks a lot for your help!

Best regards

Alex


On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Webster
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Hello,
>           Interesting, this looks like output that should be written to the
> console, rather than the Lmax file - can you confirm the two are identical?
>
> Many Regards
>
> Matthew
>
> Thanks  a lot, Mathew.
>
> Here is part of the Lmax output that I get  in response to the cluster
> command: cluster -i N18_Kurth_dAI_g7_zfrm_avg.nii.gz -t .2 --mm -n 5
> --connectivity=26 --olmax=Lmax
>
> Cluster Index   Voxels  Z-MAX   Z-MAX X (mm)    Z-MAX Y (mm)    Z-MAX Z
> (mm)    Z-COG X (mm)    Z-COG Y (mm)    Z-COG Z (mm)
> 25      7471    2.19    36      20      0       41.6    22      8.69
> 24      4496    0.877   -32     18      4       -37.4   21.9    7.18
> 23      2754    0.524   6       12      46      4.32    13.7    43.5
> 22      2102    0.5     64      -28     30      59.1    -31.7   35.4
> 21      1374    0.439   -62     -32     26      -61.1   -31.9   30.7
> ......
>
> Best
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>      I am seeing the correct numbers of local Maxima reported in the Lmax
>> file ( 5 entries for the bigger clusters ):
>>
>> Cluster Index   Z       x       y       z
>> 25      2.19    36      20      0
>> 25      0.546   52      10      0
>> 25      0.504   36      46      30
>> 25      0.344   44      50      16
>> 25      0.331   42      4       34
>> 24      0.877   -32     18      4
>> 24      0.503   -36     40      30
>> 24      0.32    -28     40      -12
>> 24      0.293   -38     -8      -12
>> 24      0.282   -52     8       10
>> <edit>
>>
>> can you paste in the contents of your Lmax file so we can check for
>> discrepancies?
>>
>> Many Regards
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> Hi Mathew,
>>
>> I am sorry i meant -t .20 and not -t 2. Could you change the threshold and
>> see what i am doing wrong here?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Matthew Webster <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>           Thank you for the upload - it looks like your image only has a
>>> single cluster, comprised of 4 voxels, after thresholding - In this case
>>> cluster is only able to report one local maximum.
>>>
>>> Many Regards
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Matthew
>>>
>>> Thanks for your response.
>>>
>>> The six reference number for this upload session is 860510 .
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Matthew Webster <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>     Can you upload your input image to:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
>>>>
>>>> and let me know the 6-digit reference number?
>>>>
>>>> Many Regards
>>>>
>>>> Matthew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Fslers,
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to use the cluster command to find peak coordinates within
>>>> large clusters of functional connectivity maps.
>>>>
>>>> The command  that I am using is this:
>>>> cluster -i SWT_zfrm.avg.nii.gz -t 2 --mm -n 5 --connectivity=26
>>>> --olmax=Lmax
>>>>
>>>> Instead of outputting 5 local maxima for each cluster, it only gives 1
>>>> as if the argument -n is being ignored.
>>>>
>>>> Could you tell me what am I going wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>