Wouldn’t a more
equitable way of dealing with survival rates post pension be to tie it to years
in the labour force. Those of us who entered it in our mid 20s,
especially since we come from an era of GRANTS for students and no fees, would
be in a different position from the poor devils who started at 15 – the school
leaving age until the early 70s. That would address different post retirement
survival rates at least for a generation.
David Byrne
From: Social-Policy is run by SPA for all social
policy specialists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen
McKay
Sent: 28 June 2010 09:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Consultation on increasing state pension age to 66 - DWP call
for evidence
This might be of interest to some.
The Government announced today a review into
the timing of the increase in State Pension age to 66. Ensuring an
equitable state pension is a key priority for the Government. We are protecting
the future value of the Basic State Pension through the triple guarantee that
it will be increased by the better of earnings, prices or 2.5%. However life
expectancy at age 65 is increasing at a faster rate than was previously
projected and we must make sure our pensions system is sustainable. To
support this review the Government has published a Call for evidence to inform
an internal review. This provides an opportunity for people and organisations
to submit evidence to help us reach our decision.
This Call for Evidence will close on 6 August
and the response will be published in the autumn. This is to ensure that as
much notice as possible can be given to those who might be affected by an
earlier rise in the State Pension age than expected.
Please send your responses or any queries
about this document to:
State Pension Age review team,
State Pensions Division,
Floor 5,
Section B,
Caxton House,
Tothill Street,
London, SW1H 9NA.
Email: [log in to unmask]
Fax: 020 7449 5896
Please ensure your response reaches us by 06
August 2010.
Steve
S D McKay, Professor of
Social Research