 |
 |
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Robin Beecroft wrote: > Anna poses an interesting issue with regard to Denmark's place at the tip of > the citation league. > http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=41 > 2083 > > Does anybody have any thoughts concerning the relative value of a CRIS as > opposed to an OA policy with regard gaining a high impact rating for an > institution's research? Why CRIS value "as opposed to an OA policy"? Surely the most telling figure will be CRIS value *in conjunction with an OA policy* (as Keith Jeffery has been advocating for years). Stevan Harnad > Robin > > ——————– > Robin Beecroft – Research Communications Consultant > www.linkedin.com/in/robinbeecroft > > Searchlighter – enlightened thinking on information environments > www.searchlighter.org > > 17 Nicholas Road, Bristol BS5 0LX, UK. > Tel/Fax: +44 (0)117 902 4506. Skype: searchlighter > > > On 22 June 2010 08:59, Anna Clements <akc -- st-andrews.ac.uk> wrote: > Has anyone else seen this week's THE with a league table for > most cited nations [based on TR Data] > > See > http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=41 > 2083 > > Not sure what all the factors are but I do find it very > interesting that Denmark tops the rankings but, as we heard at > the euroCRIS conference at beginning of the month Denmark has > only recently agreed a national strategy on OA .. although they > have had a CRIS [Pure] at their Institutions for several years > ... > > Anna > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > Anna Clements > Project Manager and University Data Architect > University of St Andrews > Business Improvements > Butts Wynd Building > St Andrews > Fife KY16 9AD > > akc -- st-andrews.ac.uk > 01334 462761 > http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/business-improvements