Print

Print


HI Everyone

 I too had some doubt about the use of the list for SPED 330 student's
reflections but having read the responses from list members I'm now thinking
a number of things. The inclusive education course I coordinate, TEHD 220,
is a compulsary course taken by all third year students currently enrolled
in an undergraduate teaching degree (this year 130 students). This is the
first year I have been fully involved with developing teaching material for
this course. One of the assignments set asked students to reflect on lecture
and tutorial material  - which included historical, contemporary, advocacy,
policy and practice issues in Disability/Inclusion - rights, social model
etc etc etc. -  in relation to their future practice as teachers of primary
and secondary school students (age range 5 -18 yrs). Over half TEHD 220
student's written responses echoed the difficulties pinpointed in the
reflections of SPED 330 students - universalist/ablist underpinnings,
we/they dualisms, helping the afflicted statements, 'giving them their
rights'  solutions etc etc etc etc, I had thought that the compulsary aspect
of the course might be a factor in explanation of some of the more fulsome
comments produced - on the assumption that students who have the choice of
opting into a course bring at least some specific prior knowledge/insight.
Now, I realise that the compulsary attendance aspect explains very little,
if at all.

So, many thanks Thomas, your initiative has made me think hard about how I
am to approach the issue of what to include in course material in 2011, what
I want students to think about in this course and how to actively engage
with them to manage the complexities involved in this topic. Would be
pleased to see if there was any way to perhaps link up with you and your
students, or others who are working in a similar positions on this ..

Best

Carol




On 5 June 2010 06:20, Beth Omansky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello Thomas!
>
> It might have been useful for you to have first introduced your idea  to
> the list to see how its members would feel about reading homework
> assignments.  There was no indication in any of the students'  posts they
> expected or
> even wanted in put from the list. Perhaps if we  had known what you wanted
> for the students we might have engaged with their  reflections. Instead,
> they
> appeared to be final thoughts from students  ending  a three-week course
> and
> probably happy to be done, as students  usually are.
>
>  I've been subscribed to this list since its inception over a  decade ago,
> and have never seen the list used for special education courses,  which are
> quite different from disability studies courses, especially disability
> studies research-oriented courses. Special education is, as you probably
> know,
> quite different from disability studies as its own academic discipline.
> Furthermore, UK and US disability studies are different from each other,
>  too.
>
> I applaud your effort to introduce your students to disability history.
> However, I found many of their responses still rooted in an
> individual/tragedy
>  model of disability.  I also found little  critical  thinking  or analysis
> about "disability" or the differences between  "disability" and
> "impairment," or a critical analysis of "normalcy." I imagine  it's
> difficult to
> present and analyze "disability" in its various usages during  just three
> weeks.
> Like others, I, too, came away from the students' papers  a bit sad that
> they were still perceiving  disabled people as 'other'  or "special needs."
>
>
> I have found our listserv members quite generous with information,
> exchanging ideas, arguing concepts, etc., and I am sorry we did not know
> what  you
> wanted from us.  Perhaps you will try this again another term., but  please
> let us know what you would like from us.  Or ask the students to  tell us.
> Also, perhaps having them engage with us throughout the  three-week course
> rather than just posting a final reflection could be  useful.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Beth
>
> Beth Omansky, Ph.D.
> Portland, OR
> USA
>
>
> In a message dated 6/4/2010 3:49:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> Good Day
> I am indeed the guilty party as I have asked my students to write a brief
> reflection and post it to a community they would do well to be connected
> to.
> I  apologize for this brief annoyance, if you have been annoyed. The
> assignment  is over today and each student posts once. The idea is to
> broaden the
> students  communities and perhaps give them continued contact as they
> remain
> members of  the list serve. Young scholars, after all, must start some
> where. I ask your  patience and perhaps willingness to mentor as each
> student
> posts one  reflection.
>
> I like one list serve members suggestion that the  relfections contain
> useful information and perhaps can be the foundation of  further schoalrly
> inquiry by seasoned group members.
>
> Be  well,
> Thomas
> Thomas J Neuville, PhD
> Associate  Professor
> Millersville University
> Stayer Suite 216
> 51 Lyte  Rd
> Millersville, PA  17551-0302
> 717-871-4880
> ________________________________________
> From:  The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [[log in to unmask]]  On Behalf Of Elizabeth Leigh
> Scherman [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:  Friday, June 04, 2010 12:05 AM
> To:  [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SPED 330 Final  Reflection
>
> Hello,
>
> Regarding the individual postings from the  SPED 330 students:
>
> While I have enjoyed reading several of these  student reflections, I would
> suggest to their instructor that the next time  they are asked to post
> suggestions, it is done in a collaborative email (i.e.  all reflections
> attached, linked, or cut and pasted) identifying the course  and the reason
> for the
> posting. That way, we would understand the context of  the messages and
> could opt to read and appreciate them at our  leisure.
>
> I do support what I sense to be the instructor's intent to  encourage
> public scholarship and dialogue; however, the delivery was a bit
>  problematic.
>
> Best,
> Elizabeth Scherman
> University of  Washington
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Beth Omansky wrote:
>
> > Hello  Listers!
> >
> > I didn't read the first few E-mails under this topic  so I may have
> missed
> > the reason students' homework assignments are  flooding the Leeds
> research
> > listserv.  Did the instructor require  students to post to the list?
> It's a
> > bit disturbing,  really.
> >
> > Beth
> >
> >
> > In a message dated  6/3/2010 7:26:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> > [log in to unmask]  writes:
> >
> > Samantha  Haas
> > SPED 330
> > Final  Refection
> >
> > Throughout this  short, but intense 3 week  class I have learned a great
> > deal about individuals  with  disabilities and their role in society over
> the
> > years.  I  never  really knew how misunderstood the term disability was
> over
> >  the years.   The misunderstandings of disabilities lead to  mistreatment
> of
> > individuals with  disabilities by members of  society, government, and
> doctors.
> > This class  taught me that in  thinking that society is fair to everyone
> I
> > am very  wrong.   I used to think that everyone is treated equally and I
> > learned   over the past three weeks that that is not true and although
> the
> >  government  has made policies to try and make it equal it is still not
> so.
> > The  information that I have learned over the past three  weeks will help
> me
> > for the  rest of my career.  The rising  popularity of inclusion in the
> > classroom  will require me to work  with individuals with disabilities.
> These
> > students with  disabilities will need to be given accommodations that
> allow
> > them to  succeed in my classroom.  The treatment of the students with
> >  disabilities may not be the same for all students, but it will be fair
> in  that
> > each student will receive the accommodations and teaching style  they
> need to
> > be able to succeed to the best of their educational  abilities.
> > The  teachings from this class and the readings that  went along with it,
> > will  always be in the back of my mind and  will always be present in my
> > teachings.  I will be sure that the  unjust among these individuals will
> not
> > continue in my  classroom.
> >
> > ________________End of   message________________
> >
> > This Disability-Research Discussion  list is  managed by the Centre for
> > Disability Studies at the  University of Leeds
> > (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
> >  Enquiries about list administration  should be sent to
> >  [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Archives  and  tools are located  at:
> >  www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > You can VIEW,   POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
> >  page.
> >
> > ________________End of  message________________
> >
> > This Disability-Research Discussion  list is managed by the Centre for
> Disability Studies at the University of  Leeds
> (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
> > Enquiries about list  administration should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Archives and tools  are located at:
> >  www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > You can VIEW, POST,  JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
> page.
> >
>
> ________________End of  message________________
>
> This Disability-Research Discussion list is  managed by the Centre for
> Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
> (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
> Enquiries about list administration  should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Archives  and tools are located  at:
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> You can VIEW,  POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
> page.
> ________________End of message________________
>
> This  Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
> Disability  Studies at the University of Leeds
> (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
> Enquiries about list administration  should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Archives  and tools are located  at:
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> You can VIEW,  POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
> page.
>
> ________________End of message________________
>
> This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
> Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (
> www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
> Enquiries about list administration should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Archives and tools are located at:
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.
>

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.