Print

Print


medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

The Magdalen College pontifical also states 'de sinistro angulo ab  
oriente . . . usque in dextrum angulum occidentalem . . . et a dextro  
angulo orientali . . . usque in sinistrum angulum occidentalem'.  I  
did wonder about which corner was meant by sinister - left as one sees  
it facing east i.e. north, rather that 'stage left'?

Thank you, Carlos, for the offer of your paper - would it be possible  
to send it as an attachment to my email address (below)?
The diagram does assume a simple, rectangular building.  The church  
I'm thinking of probably had a semi-circular apse in the twelfth  
century (this was replaced with a rectangular chancel in the 13th  
century).
It has been suggested to me that there would not have been a ceremony  
at the institution of the priest, when he was presented to the parish  
by his patron in 1219.  The church would, presumably, have been  
consecrated a hundred or so years earlier when it had been built - but  
it seems it is possible that the full ceremony would not have occurred  
then?

Thank you everyone for all your help - I didn't realise what an  
interesting discussion I was initiating!
Cate

On 7 Apr 2010, at 00:25, John Briggs wrote:

> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and  
> culture
>
> Whether the 1961 Pontificale Romanum is unchanged from medieval  
> practice is, of course, the point at issue! There was no Roman  
> Pontifical until 1596 (and the Roman Curia exceeded the brief given  
> them by the Council of Trent -- to issue a new Breviary and Missal  
> -- by issuing the 1596 Pontificale and the 1614 Rituale.) But  
> William Durandus's 13th-century pontifical was hugely influential  
> and practically determined all subsequent one. But we are concerned  
> with earlier versions. The Carolingian Ordo translated by Repsher  
> seems to be the earliest, which is why it would be nice to nail down  
> precisely what it says. There seems to be general confusion: Bishop  
> Wordsworth quotes from the "Spotted Book" which starts both  
> alphabets from the east. I am looking at David de Bernham's  
> Pontifical (early 13th century) and it clearly states that the Greek  
> alphabet is inscribed from north-east to south-west [de sinistro  
> angulo ab oriente ... usque in dextrum angulum occidentalem] and the  
> Latin alphabet then from south-east to north-west [a dextro angulo  
> orientali ... usque in sinistrum angulum occidentalem]. The Liber  
> Pontificalis of Edmund Lacy says the same.
>
> John Briggs
>
>
> On 06/04/2010 22:45, Stan Metheny wrote:
>> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and  
>> culture
>>
>> FWIW, the rubric in the 1961 _Pontificale Romanum_ [unchanged from  
>> medieval
>> practice?] states:
>> '. . . scribit . . . alphabetum graecum incipiens ab angulo inferiore
>> sinistro, et alphabetum latinum incipiens ab angulo inferior  
>> dextero . . .'
>> Assuming the main altar in the church is against the East wall, as  
>> the
>> diagram in the _PR_ does, then the Greek letters go from north-west  
>> up to
>> south-east, and the Latin from south-west up to north-east.
>>
>> Stan Metheny
>>
>>
>>> Some years ago I publshed a paper on the church consecration rite.  
>>> If you
>>> are interested, I can send you a copy of it. Besides, you can see a
>>>
>> diagram
>>

Cate Gunn
[log in to unmask]




**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html