Print

Print


Hi Jay,

your command and design files seem fine. 

Matt has the feeling that the tfce correction might make the whole thing stall. This might be for various reasons, one of which being a wrong subject ordering. Are you absolutely sure to have concatenated your subjects in GM_mod_merg in the same order as you assume they are in the design.mat? In other words, if you've run VBM with all the default settings, it will have concatenated the subjects in the alphabetical order, which then MUST correspond to the design.mat ordering. 
In any case, even if you feel that the order is right, could you please re-run randomise with --debug and let us know the outcome?

Cheers,
Gwenaelle

--- En date de : Jeu 15.4.10, Jay Ives <[log in to unmask]> a écrit :

De: Jay Ives <[log in to unmask]>
Objet: [FSL]
À: [log in to unmask]
Date: Jeudi 15 avril 2010, 11h15


Hi Gwenaelle,



Here are the design files. The command I used was 

randomise -i GM_mod_merg_s3 -m GM_mask -o fslvbm -d design.mat -t design.con -T -n 5000 -V



Thanks for the help.



J

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gwenaëlle 
DOUAUD 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [FSL] FSLVBM GLM Setup




  
  
    Hi Jay,



this should not take that long... There 
      might be indeed something wrong in your design or the set up of your 
      contrasts (though just showing them separately is not saying that much to 
      us).



Could you please attach the design.mat and .con as well as the 
      command you've typed to run 
      randomise?



Cheers,

Gwenaelle



--- En date de : Mar 
      13.4.10, Jay Ives <[log in to unmask]> a écrit :


      

De: 
        Jay Ives <[log in to unmask]>

Objet: Re: [FSL] FSLVBM GLM 
        Setup

À: [log in to unmask]

Date: Mardi 13 avril 2010, 
0h48




        Hi Gwenaëlle (and Mark),



I did use your 
        method 2, but thought I got it wrong because randomise stalled at 
        iteration 2! I gave it overnight, but no progress.

With 70 subjects 
        in 4 groups (of different sizes), is this expected to take a long time? 
        It might have taken forever...



Thx



J



On Tue Apr 13 2:20 , Gwenaëlle DOUAUD 
        sent:




        Hi 
          Mark and Jay,



there is no good answer to this question I'm 
          afraid. 



Say you've got two subjects in group A, 3 in B and 4 
          in C, then both approaches are valid:



Method I



A 
          B



1 0

1 0

0 1

0 1

0 1

for the design.mat of the 
          first A and B groups with 



1 -1 (A-B)

-1 1 (B-A)

for the 
          design.con

and then repeat for groups B and C, then groups A and C 
          (which is what you did Mark).



Method II



A B C



1 0 
          0

1 0 0

0 1 0

0 1 0

0 1 0

0 0 1

0 0 1

0 0 1

0 
          0 1

for the design.mat of the 3 groups with



1 -1 0 
          (A-B)

-1 1 0 (B-A)

0 1 -1 (B-C)

0 -1 1 (C-B)

1 0 -1 
          (A-C)

-1 0 1 (C-A)

for the design.con (t-tests)

and 



1 
          0 1 0 0 0

for the design.fts (F-test, as many columns as there are 
          rows in your design.con, you just need to click in "F-tests" in the 
          Glm gui and then click in front of the two relevant "Contrasts" you 
          have already set up)



So with Method II, you can also ask the 
          question of where are the changes *across the 3 groups* (F-test with 
          the design.fts). You also get an increase in DoF but, as Tom Nichols 
          said, if it happens that group C for instance has wildly smaller 
          variance, you can get inflated significances (or reduced power if it 
          has wildly larger variance).



So it depends on what your main 
          question is, really. 



Hope this helps,

Gwenaelle 
          





--- En date de : Lun 12.4.10, Mark Walterfang <[log in to unmask]> a 
          écrit :



> De: Mark Walterfang <[log in to unmask]>

> Objet: Re: 
          [FSL] FSLVBM GLM Setup

> À: [log in to unmask]

> Date: Lundi 12 avril 2010, 
          14h18

> Hi all

> 

> I'm in the same situation as 
          Jay. I have three groups

> (illness1, illness2

> and 
          controls), all matched to each other. I've run three

> two-way 
          analyses,

> which is pretty laborious and I'm pretty sure it's 
          not

> statistically ideal.

> What I can't work out is how 
          to set up the design matrices

> & contrasts in

> the 
          way Jay describes, as the online manual for Randomise

> doesn't 
          really

> provide guidance here. Gwenaëlle, is this something 
          you

> can advise on?

> 

> Thanks in advance,

> 
          

> Mark Walterfang

> 

> 

> On 10/4/10 12:29 
          PM, "Jay Ives" <[log in to unmask]>

> 
          wrote:

> 

> > I have 70 subjects in 4 groups and would 
          like to test

> between individual

> > groups and 
          combinations of the groups. Can someone

> please advise me how 
          to set

> > up the design.mat and design.con files to do 
          this?

> Thx

> 

> 

> WARNING: This 
          message

> > originated from outside the 
          Northern/Melbourne/Western

> Health e-mail network.

> > 
          The sender cannot be validated. Caution is advised.

> Contact IT 
          Services (+61 3

> > ) 9342 8888 for more information.

>