Print

Print


Thanks, Stephen!
(My first question solved itself - it wrote the zstats for pill, cycle and
their interaction under the four cope directories - angry face etc. - from
my first-level analysis.)

Klara

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 19 Apr 2010, at 20:13, Klara Mareckova wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> could anybody please help me setting up my design for a voxelwise analysis
> of 2by2 ANOVA? I'm trying to follow the directions from
> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/feat5/detail.html, but I'm not really sure
> if I'm setting up the EVs correctly.
>
> My study has 40 subjects divided into 4 groups: on pill & menstruation, on
> pill & ovulation, free & menstruation, free & ovulation.
> In the first level analysis, I had 5 conditions (EVs) where participants
> were were watching angry faces, angry hands, neutral faces, neutral hands or
> control condition. In the higher level analysis, I would like to explore the
> main effect of pill, main effect of cycle phase and their interaction.
>
> Setting up the contrasts & F test seems pretty easy then:
> pill                   100 0          on, off, off
> cycle               010 0          off, on, off
> pill * cycle       001 0           off, off, on
>
> What is more of a puzzle for me are the EVs:
> 1. Am I not working with my 5 conditions from 1st level analysis (angry,
> neutral,..) at all?
>
>
> I don't quite understand - presumably at first level you will make a
> contrast of interest (e.g. angry vs neutral) and then feed that up for all
> sessions/subjects into the higher level modelling?   You could then repeat
> that for each first-level contrast of interest?
>
> 2. If so, would the EV set up look like this?
>
> group    cycle     group    interaction      grandmean
> 1            1            1        1                          1
> 1            1            1        1                          1
> 1            1            1        1                          1
> 1            1            1        1                          1
> 1            1            1        1                          1
> 1            -1           1        -1                         1
> 1            -1           1         -1                        1
> 1            -1           1         -1                        1
> 1            -1           1         -1                        1
> 1            -1           1         -1                        1
> 2            1            -1        -1                        1
> 2            1            -1        -1                        1
> 2            1           -1         -1                        1
> 2            1            -1        -1                        1
> 2            1            -1        -1                        1
> 2            -1           -1        1                          1
> 2            -1           -1        1                          1
> 2            -1          -1         1                          1
> 2            -1          -1         1                          1
> 2            -1          -1         1                          1
>
>
> Yes
>
> 3. With the set up above, I'm getting a warning: "design matrix uses
> different groups but these do not separable EVs for the different groups"
>
>
> yes - this design is not "separable" so just set all the "group
> memberships" to 1.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
> Do you happen to have any suggestion what am I supposed to change to get
> the right design for my study?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Klara
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Associate Director,  Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>
> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
> +44 (0) 1865 222726  (fax 222717)
> [log in to unmask]    http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>