 |
 |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:45:57PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: > > My reply, in essence, said that we have long had a notion of > _document_ status (e.g., "DCMI Recommendation") but that we > never formalized that as an RDF property, nor did we extend > the notion of status to individual terms -- actually two > separate issues -- though perhaps we should. Perhaps the point > is that we did not apply metadata recursively to the description > of the specification documents, in which case we would have needed > to coin a property for status. I believe that was actually on > our radar screen at one point but not as a priority. > > Would you like to propose one? It does seem like an obvious > gap... I should say that it is coming back onto our radar screen in the context of exploring the use of RDFa in DCMI Web pages, so it has occurred to us that we should coin new properties such as "status" to fill in the gaps. Tom -- Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>