 |
 |
Sorry I raised it then. I think it is about what you are used to. Most of the lists I am on have a choice of reply to sender or reply to all which sends a message to the list. Most of the time people reply to all and the message goes to the list and there is good discussion, as on this list. It seems that midwives aren't very familiar with using a 'reply to all' option, unlike the people on the other lists. It may be that a trial period would give you a chance to test it, but that most people are worried about trying this. Alison Alison Macfarlane Department of Midwifery and Child Health City University London 20 Bartholomew Close London EC1A 7QN Phone (0) (44) 207 040 5832 Fax (0) (44) 207 040 5717 Email [log in to unmask] www.city.ac.uk This email and its contents are the property of City University London. If you are not the intended recipient of this message and any attached files, please delete it. Unauthorised copying or distribution of this message, its attachments or parts thereof, is strictly prohibited unless specifically stated otherwise. Please consider the environment before printing my email -----Original Message----- From: Anita Hughes [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: 03 March 2010 10:28 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) I agree, as would rather not miss out on discussion and it is easy to just delete the rare mistakes. Anita Hughes Research Associate, University of Nottingham, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, Academic Division of Midwifery, B Floor, East Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham. NG7 2UH. Tel: 0115 8230986 Secretary to The Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology -----Original Message----- From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ólöf Ásta Ólafsdóttir Sent: 03 March 2010 00:05 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) > The same here Olof Asta I just ignore mistakes, I like the discussion. > > Jenny Parratt > > -----Original Message----- > From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health > research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah > Caine > Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2010 6:38 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) > > I agree with below. It is not often that these mistakes are made. > > Deborah Caine > > > Alison Cooke writes: > >> I'm happy to receive any item that comes through. When it is obviously >> meant for one person I just delete it. I would hate for settings to be >> changed and then possibly not receive important contributions. >> >> Thanks >> Alison Cooke >> Research Midwife >> >> Quoting "Sandall, Jane" <[log in to unmask]>: >> >>> Hi >>> It is possible to set default to reply to sender with an option to >>> reply >>> to list or vice versa >>> I think most people will reply to whatever the default is set to. >>> There are about 550 people on the list. >>> Ill, wait until end of week and take a majority view >>> bw >>> Jane >>> >>> Professor Jane Sandall >>> Professor of Social Science and Women's Health >>> Programme Director (Innovations) NIHR King's Patient Safety and >>> Service >>> Quality Research Centre >>> >>> Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences >>> King's College London School of Medicine, >>> Floor 7, Capital House, 42 Weston St >>> London SE1 3QD, UK >>> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 6261/6604 >>> Mobile: +44(0)7713 743150 >>> e-mail:[log in to unmask] >>> http://www.kingspssq.org.uk/ >>> http://myprofile.cos.com/sandall >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health >>> research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C. Roth >>> [[log in to unmask]] >>> Sent: 02 March 2010 16:48 >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: Re: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) >>> >>> are the settings mutually exclusive? i.e. if the default is to reply to >>> an individual, is it not also possible to choose to reply to the whole >>> list? >>> >>> Carolyn Roth >>> Lead Midwife for Education >>> Keele University, School of Nursing & Midwifery >>> Clinical Education Centre >>> Newcastle Road >>> Stoke on Trent >>> ST4 6QG, UK >>> >>> Tel. 01782 55 65 26 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sandall, Jane wrote: >>>> Before I change this, it is important that list members who send >>>> queries to the list are happy to summarise replies sent directly to >>>> them for the benefit of the list, otherwise the value of the >>>> discussion >>>> list is lost. Is everyone happy to do this as it will be extra work? >>>> bw >>>> Jane >>>> >>>> Professor Jane Sandall >>>> Professor of Social Science and Women's Health >>>> Programme Director (Innovations) NIHR King's Patient Safety and >>>> Service >>>> Quality Research Centre >>>> >>>> Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences >>>> King's College London School of Medicine, >>>> Floor 7, Capital House, 42 Weston St >>>> London SE1 3QD, UK >>>> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 6261/6604 >>>> Mobile: +44(0)7713 743150 >>>> e-mail:[log in to unmask] >>>> http://www.kingspssq.org.uk/ >>>> http://myprofile.cos.com/sandall >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health >>>> research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of König >>>> Claudia (konc) [[log in to unmask]] >>>> Sent: 02 March 2010 13:14 >>>> To: [log in to unmask] >>>> Subject: AW: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) >>>> >>>> I agree with the suggestion too. >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Claudia >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________ >>>> >>>> Dr. phil. Claudia König >>>> Leiterin F&E Institut für Hebammen >>>> Departement Gesundheit >>>> >>>> ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften >>>> Technikumstrasse 71, CH-8401 Winterthur >>>> >>>> Tel. 058 934 64 05, Fax 058 935 64 05 >>>> >>>> eMail [log in to unmask] >>>> >>>> www.gesundheit.zhaw.ch >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health >>>> research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von >>>> Hunter, Billie >>>> Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2010 11:14 >>>> An: [log in to unmask] >>>> Betreff: Re: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) >>>> >>>> That sounds like a very sensible solution, if it is possible to do? >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> Billie >>>> >>>> >>>> Billie Hunter >>>> Professor of Midwifery >>>> Institute for Health Research >>>> School of Human and Health Sciences >>>> Floor 2 Vivian Tower >>>> Swansea University >>>> Swansea SA2 8PP >>>> >>>> Tel: +44 (0)1792 518584 >>>> Fax: +44 (0) 1792 295127 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health >>>> research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >>>> Alison >>>> Powell >>>> Sent: 28 February 2010 13:17 >>>> To: [log in to unmask] >>>> Subject: Managing the list (query about the default for replies) >>>> >>>> Dear List-readers >>>> >>>> Given that we're all human and that even experienced list-users have >>>> made >>>> several embarrassing errors in the past few months in posting >>>> personal/confidential messages to the whole list, I think that it does >>>> make >>>> sense to take the systems approach to avoiding error. >>>> >>>> Perhaps the default should be that a reply goes to the sender (rather >>>> than to >>>> the whole list) but with a prompt box to say "Would you like to send >>>> this >>>> message to the whole list?" >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if this is possible within the Jiscmail set up but it >>>> might >>>> prevent >>>> some embarrassment/irritation! >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Alison Powell >>>> Social Dimensions of Health Institute >>>> Universities of Dundee and St Andrews >> >> >> >> -- >> Alison Cooke >> Research Midwife >> Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust >> and The University of Manchester >> 5th Floor, Research >> St Mary's Hospital >> Oxford Road >> Manchester >> M13 9WL >> >> Tel +44 (0)161 276 5469 >> >> Email: [log in to unmask] >> [log in to unmask] > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.