 |
 |
in fact - we can go with that - Liddy On 09/03/2010, at 6:47 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 9 Mar 2010, at 08:26, Liddy Nevile <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> We are using DC as the core for the new MLR but to do this properly >> we need a definition for 'resource' as the domain of the terms. >> What do we have, please? or what do you recommend? > > Why do you think you need this? > > Can you give any examples of things that are *not* in this class > 'Resource'? If not then it is just the default all-inclusive class > that Rdfs calls rdfs:Resource (and OWL calls 'Thing'). > > Cheers > > Dan