 |
 |
Hello, Tim says that it's working ok for him (snapshot attached) and also: "Does the selected chain actually contain any Glycines? With regards to the prediction, because it is probability based the distinctive types naturally get stronger predictions because their shifts are distinctive." Wayne On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Mattias Brink wrote: > > Hi, > > I have noticed that the spin system type scoring for Glycine is not working > correct , see attachment. Spin system 79 is without a doubt a glycine. > Can you fix this? It has quite a big influence on the sequence location > matching. > > Question: Does the matching include stronger weighting for very unique > residue types, such as Gly, Ala, Ser, and Thr? I think it might help in > getting more unique matches for the sequence locations. > > Thanks, > > Mattias > >