I have a prison officer who donated
his kidney to his wife, and another one just about to donate to his
brother
To be honest my guy who`s done it is
doing full operational duties, and the one who`s going to do it is very
concerned about whether he will be removed from his post as a dog
handler. We wouldnt state (eg on pre - employment) that someone with one
kidney wasnt " fit " for full operational duties so why would we during
employment? Granted - I suppose that if (for instance) there was a
penetrating wound to the remaining kidney that could be fairly catastrophic but
would have thought that the issue was about managing risk rather than avoiding
it.
Begs the question - what about people
with monocular vision?
I think it raises some interesting
questions, more probably from an HR /employment law perspective than OH. Is she
covered by DDA? Could she claim discrimination on either her basis or from the
basis of her spouse? even so is it a reasonable adjustment to maintain someone
in a non operational role for the remainder of her career?
Got to say - if she was a prison
officer they would take on board the OH advice, risk assess, listen to her views
and the she would most likely get her P45
Good afternoon, the OHP I work
with has the following issue and I wondered what the views of this list would
have on the following scenario:
Police officer donates kidney to her
spouse. No complications from the procedure and remaining kidney healthy. Due
the perceived potential consequences of trauma to the remaining kidney, she is
of the view that she is permanently unfit for front-line confrontational duties
of any kind and is not prepared to expose herself to these scenarios in view of
this.
Police officers are recruited with unilateral kidney and home
office guidelines/standards say usually suitable.
I have advised that the
organisation should be involved in the decision on suitability for f/l duties
taking acct of OH advice, actuarial risk of trauma (from historical rates etc),
and her preparedness to accept a heightened risk, albeit possibly v
small.
Wondered whether others had come across similar situations or have
any data on risk of renal injury in cf situations eg Armed Forces, Fire Service.
We could advise risk asst and restriction from the v high risk activities eg
firearms, response driving but again the actuarial risk may be v low. I am sure
a firearms officer with one kidney would be aggrieved to be redeployed as
consequences of firearm injury would be equally serious whichever part of the
body it passed through ie in effect risk probably no greater to
background.
Colleagues have also mentioned the moral dimension/dilemmas
for the organisation with organ donation and how far they should go in
supporting restrictions.”
Thank you in advance
for your views.
Joanne Davies
OHA
This email was received
from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.
******************************** Please remove this footer before
replying.
OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION http://www.aohne.org.uk
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.