Print

Print


This commentary on the British system highlights problems that are strikingly similar to one faced in Canadian universities, or at least those in Ontario. Universities here have worked under a funding formula for the last several years in which domestic students earn the university money from the provincial government, with masters and phd students netting more per student than undergraduates. Every university has its "studentshed" that it works with, while also trying to get in on the growing Toronto market. Tuition fee increases are capped at 4 or 4.5% annually for domestic students, so while everyone is competing for a piece of the domestic student market knowing those limits, universities are also desperately seeking ways to increase their number of international students, since annual increases in their tuition are not capped (so at my university, their tuition was increased around 8% I believe from 08/09 to 09/10). Universities fall over themselves to pioneer new ways of recruiting international students, including the use of private recruitment agencies (which often work for than one Ontario university in the same foreign market), opening "storefronts" in developing countries, and even bringing in outside contractors to recruit students and teach first-year courses on campus. This is all in the context of dwindling public money for higher ed, and halting attempts to inculcate a competitive entrepreneurial culture within and between faculties and schools in universities (i.e., one of my university's Board members told the local newspaper that it would soon be time to start "picking winners and losers" among departments and faculty on campus as we face budgetary restraints). Thus far, we have not faced the kind of cuts threatened in the UK universities, but we are seeing higher workloads as those who leave or retire (with serious concerns about pension fund solvency) are not replaced and support and maintenance staff positions are cut.

So this discussion from my British colleagues is quite worrying - it seems like this kind of competitive austerity is becoming best practice in university administration. Is there a way to more cohesively and aggressively counter this in a kind of alternative internationalization effort that recaptures and recasts the university's role as a public good that deserves support? Or is too far gone for that at the moment?
Jamey

************************************************
Dr. Jamey Essex
1139 Chrysler Hall North
Department of Political Science
University of Windsor
Windsor, ON, Canada
(519) 253-3000 ext 2358
[log in to unmask]
************************************************

-----A forum for critical and radical geographers <[log in to unmask]> wrote: -----

To: [log in to unmask]
From: Eric Olund <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: A forum for critical and radical geographers <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 02/10/2010 09:02AM
Subject: Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare to cope with cuts

Higher ed funding in England and Wales (not sure about Scotland) is a bit
complicated and comes from several streams, all of which are being cut, but to
simplify, there is an absolute cap on 'home' (EU) undergraduate student places
because these are effectively funded by the government on a per student basis,
rather than a block-grant approach which would allow a university to teach
however many it wanted to with a given amount of money.  The government not
only sets limits on the number of places it will fund, it has begun to actively
penalise universities that overrecruit, which is a particular danger to
institutions given the sharp increase in applications the last couple of years
and the freeze on places.  My understanding is that financial penalties had
only been threatened in the past, but will actually be implemented this year.
Thus recruiting over the government's quota will become very expensive.

'Overseas' students (non-EU) pay their own way (as I believe do most masters
students, both home and overseas).  An increase in overseas numbers will not
help increase the number of home students universities will accept, but it will
help the balance sheet of universities and therefore save (some) jobs in the
face of government cuts by offloading the costs of our higher ed system onto
other countries, which presents obvious ethical questions about where we
recruit from.  Ditto of course for increasing the tuition fees that home
students pay and therefore increasing the proportion of their education costs
they pay and therefore preserving banking industry and Olympic subsidies.  The
political will is not (yet) there to completely marketise undergrad education,
but the direction of both major parties here is crystal clear.

So the pressure will increase to realign programmes and therefore staff to
attract overseas undergrad and all masters students and the money the bring,
and to increase grant income as a proportion of an institution's budget.  The
former depends on the vagaries of the international economy, and the latter
does too along with the vagaries of government funding, which as mentioned is
downward.  As another critter noted, this is going to greatly increase the
individualised competitive culture of the academic workplace and all the
goodies that will bring.

Best,
Eric
--
Dr. Eric Olund
Lecturer in Human Geography
Department of Geography
University of Sheffield
Winter Street
Sheffield, S10 2TN
UK
Phone: 0114 222 7982
Fax:   0114 279 7912


Quoting Linda Kaucher <[log in to unmask]>:

> I am glad if there is some discussion on these interrelated issues, and
> certainly stand to be corrected if I am wrong on my understanding of the
> situation.
>  
> I am not clear on the numbers game whether more overseas students translates
> into more funding for more places overall, or if, either in policy or
> pragmatically, there is an overall limit, and it just reduces the places
> available to home (EU) students.
>  
> I think the issue that you highlight is and has been a very real one for a
> long time, and the bottom line pressure is presumably as intense as ever in
> that regard.
>  
> If there is an overall limit, I guess a shortage of places could,
> theoretically, raise the bar for overseas students. But that depends, as in
> the point I originally raised, how far institutions will switch towards
> foreign students and away from home students.
>  
> LK
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A forum for critical and radical geographers on behalf of Jung Won
> Sonn
> Sent: Wed 2/10/2010 11:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare to
> cope with cuts
>
>
>
> Dear Linda,
>
> I am with you in worrying about UK universities' emphasis on recruitment of
> non EU students. But I have a slightly different take on it.
>
> If we accept more non-EU students, the additional tuition fee will let us to
> accept more domestic students. In that sense, more international students
> means more higher education for domestic students in the long run, which is
> a good thing, I suppose.
>
> What I worry about is that, if we become too aggressive in accepting
> international students, we will be accepting students who are not capable of
> meeting the standard we set here. Then, they will fail in finishing the
> degree and go back to their country empty handed or have hard time
> preventing that situation. It is easy to blame unqualified students for
> their failure but before they try, they won't know the standard. We do. We
> are supposed to screen students before they come. And that screening will be
> more difficult if the university management sees non-EU students as money
> cows. That is already happening in some universities, some of us may want to
> argue.
>
> Regards,
> Jung Won
>
> =================================
>
> Jung Won SONN
> Ph.D. in Urban Planning
> Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Urban Economic Development
> BSc. Programme Director
>
> Bartlett School of Planning
> UCL, University of London
> Phone: +44 (0)20 7679 4893
> Fax: +44 (0)87 1251 9402
>
> New MSc: Sustainable Urbanism:
> http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/planning/programmes/msc_dp/sust_u.htm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Linda Kaucher" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare to
> cope with cuts
>
>
> I have seen nothing in the media or in discussion that cross references
> Mandelson's HE funding cuts with the foreign student market on which
> universities have been so focussed for so long, which is often, in crude
> terms, at least in some universities, selling immigration.
>
> If, because of the fees difference, the net result is a bigger percentage of
> foreign students to home students (in fact EU students), then it would seem
> that the situation of shortage of university places is set to hit home
> students disproportionately hard.
>
> The fact that there is no dividing line between UK and EU students does not
> appear to help this situation, for actual UK students.
>
> And as academics come to realise that their jobs rely on the
> trade-in-services liberalised education market, which is now the recognised
> situation for Australian academics, they are likely to go along with this.
>
> But whither higher education for young people in the UK?
>
> LK
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A forum for critical and radical geographers on behalf of Lawrence
> Berg
> Sent: Wed 2/10/2010 3:32 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare to
> cope with cuts
>
>
>
> Stuart,
> Thanks for your note and sorry to hear about the very difficult situation
> that Leeds colleagues find themselves in.  I've gone to the LeedsUCU blog
> site and found all sorts of helpful information.  One thing that wasn't
> readily clear to me, however, is who we might write to at the university to
> express our concerns.  I know that letter writing can often be somewhat
> ineffective, but Leeds senior administrators are likely to be very keen to
> avoid bad international publicity in their bid to become one of the world's
> 'top 50' universities.  Is there some way to publicize on the CGF list the
> appropriate people to send letters to (including UCU staff whom we can copy
> to), and some key 'talking points' for CGF members to put into their
> letters?
> Thanks,
> Lawrence
>
>
> On 10-02-09 2:41 PM, "Stuart Hodkinson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Lawrence
> >
> > I'm afraid I have bad news - I am 100% convinced that the UK funding cuts
> > are
> > going to cost thousands of jobs. My own university (University of Leeds)
> > is
> > embarking on cuts of between 10% and 20%, which could mean up to 700 jobs
> > being shed. Management has just announced a Voluntary Leavers Scheme,
> > which no
> > one is their right mind would touch if it wasn't for the threat of
> > compulsory
> > redundancies hanging over us.
> >
> > What is interesting, and very sad, is how the University is using the
> > 'crisis'
> > to restructure as part of the VC's ambition to be in the world top 50
> > universities, an ambition that frankly very few believe is possible let
> > alone
> > desirable. Each department has been forced to come up with their own
> > 'plan' to
> > cut 10% from the budget with the condition that cuts must be 'strategic'.
> > What
> > this means, of course, is that department managers are compiling lists of
> > those academics deemed to be 'loss making' to the university (i.e. they
> > don't
> > cover their salaries through teaching and research), with a special
> > emphasis
> > on those who will struggle to be returned in the next 'Research Assessment
> > Exercise' (a major source of university income based on 'quality' of
> > research).
> >
> > Then there are those who are on fixed term contracts like myself, many of
> > whom
> > are externally funded, who will in all probability simply leave the
> > university
> > once our contracts are up because of budget constraints. At the same time,
> > we
> > are told that if we happened to strike lucky and bring in a research grant
> > that covers 20% of our salary, then the University will fund the rest and
> > keep
> > us on.
> >
> > So there are the headline job losses and the hidden job losses as
> > contracts
> > end and are not renewed, but also an intensification of the neoliberal
> > agenda
> > within the university, as academics are made increasingly responsible for
> > financing their own jobs and thus becoming ever more entrepreneurial,
> > competitive and individualistic.
> >
> > We are experiencing a classic case of the 'shock doctrine'. I recommend
> > CGF
> > members read our local trade union 'blog' -
> > http://leedsucu.wordpress.com/ -
> > to see how the cuts are playing out on campus.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
> > [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Berg
> > [[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: 09 February 2010 15:47
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare
> > to
> > cope with cuts
> >
> > Thanks everyone for the responses to my post of the Guardian article.  I
> > have to admit that I am a bit skeptical about 6% cuts leading to
> > 'thousands
> > of job losses'.  Whilst Canadian universities have not had similar cuts in
> > direct government funding, they did sustain very large losses to endowment
> > funds (upwards of 40%), plus many institutions have received no increased
> > funding to deal with increased costs from inflation over the last few
> > years,
> > and we have not seen similar reports of job losses here.  My primary
> > reason
> > for posting the Guardian article is to suggest that those on the CGF list
> > might keep tabs on issues and report any alarming developments (such as
> > large numbers of proposed redundancies on the part of specific
> > universities)
> > to the list.  We might then use the collective power of CGF members to
> > contest any such developments.
> > Best wishes to all,
> > Lawrence
> >
> >
> > On 10-02-09 7:31 AM, "Tim Brown" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> While I agree that it is vitally important that reports of any kind in
> >> the media are as transparent as they can be with regards to their data,
> >> I have to object to the notion that this is simply the "routine
> >> management" of staff.
> >>
> >> For many of us, and I am one who has managed to remain within the
> >> academy for some time on such contracts, the current period that we are
> >> going into is far from "routine", as there has been a noticeable
> >> shrinkage in the posts that are available. So while 'tenured' staff may
> >> be secure, and I hope that they are, there are many 'non-tenured' staff
> >> who face a very different and extremely uncertain future.
> >>
> >> If stories such as those in the Guardian help to highlight this
> >> situation, and perhaps the fact that many Departments have relied on
> >> such staff to both maintain their research trajectories and also to
> >> teach growing numbers of undergraduates, then that is surely no bad
> >> thing.
> >>
> >> just a thought
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >>
> >> David C Gibbs wrote:
> >>> Indeed Alan ­ a similar email came from our head of HR the same day ­
> >>> see below.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear colleagues
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In response to the figure of 300 job losses quoted in today¹s Guardian,
> >>> the University can confirm that this relates almost exclusively to the
> >>> routine management of staff nearing the end of fixed-term contracts over
> >>> the period of 2009-11.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Previous experience has shown that, in many cases, staff in these
> >>> circumstances were awarded further contracts or redeployed to other
> >>> positions internally.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For the sake of clarity, the University presently has no plans under
> >>> consideration which would lead to the loss of staff on continuing
> >>> contracts of employment.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David Gibbs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Professor of Human Geography*
> >>>
> >>> Department of Geography
> >>>
> >>> University of Hull
> >>>
> >>> Hull
> >>>
> >>> HU6 7RX
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Email [log in to unmask]
> >>>
> >>> Tel. 01482 465330 (direct)
> >>>
> >>> Tel. 0784 0869355 (Mobile)
> >>>
> >>> Fax 01482 466340 (Geography)
> >>>
> >>> www.hull.ac.uk/geog/staff/Gibbs.htm
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Director of the Graduate School*
> >>>
> >>> Tel. 01482 466844 (Graduate School)
> >>>
> >>> Fax 01482 466436 (Graduate School)
> >>>
> >>> www.hull.ac.uk/graduateschool
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* A forum for critical and radical geographers
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Patterson, Alan
> >>> *Sent:* 09 February 2010 13:20
> >>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> >>> *Subject:* Re: Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities
> >>> prepare to cope with cuts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I wonder how accurate the data referred to in the Guardian story really
> >>> is - here¹s our VC¹s response:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear all
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Today's Guardian newspaper reported that 340 jobs are to be cut at
> >>> Sheffield Hallam University. The report is not true.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The report is in fact based on a national Trade Union report. We have
> >>> notified the Trade Unions, as we are required to by law, that 340
> >>> Associate Lecturers no longer work for us, and have not worked for us
> >>> for at least 18 months. They are therefore being removed from the
> >>> University¹s books as part of a routine annual exercise. This doesn¹t
> >>> mean that they have not been replaced. It simply means that they are no
> >>> longer working for the University.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I should add that I was very angry to read this report. Reports about
> >>> financial meltdown in the University sector are creating lots of
> >>> uncertainty and anxiety. As I¹ve said recently we are currently in a
> >>> fairly strong financial position. However, finances are getting
> >>> increasingly tough, and we are continuing to keep staff costs under
> >>> control. As a consequence we are not yet facing the financial
> >>> difficulties of other universities.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Professor Philip Jones
> >>>
> >>> Vice-Chancellor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* A forum for critical and radical geographers
> >>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Lawrence Berg
> >>> *Sent:* 08 February 2010 23:27
> >>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> >>> *Subject:* Guardian: Thousands to lose jobs as UK universities prepare
> >>> to cope with cuts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thousands to lose jobs as universities prepare to cope with cuts
> >>> EUR Post-graduates to replace professors
> >>> EUR Staff poised to strike over proposals of cuts
> >>> Jessica Shepherd and Owen Bowcott
> >>> guardian.co.uk,     Sunday 7 February 2010 21.33 GMT
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Universities across the country are preparing to axe thousands of
> >>> teaching jobs, close campuses and ditch courses to cope with government
> >>> funding cuts, the Guardian has learned.
> >>>
> >>> Other plans include using post-graduates rather than professors for
> >>> teaching and the delay of major building projects. The proposals have
> >>> already provoked ballots for industrial action at a number of
> >>> universities in the past week raising fears of strike action which could
> >>> severely disrupt lectures and examinations.
> >>>
> >>> The Guardian spoke to vice-chancellors and other senior staff at 25
> >>> universities, some of whom condemned the funding squeeze as "painful"
> >>> and "insidious". They warned that UK universities were being pushed
> >>> towards becoming US-style, quasi-privatised institutions.
> >>>
> >>> The cuts are being put in place to cope with the announcement last week
> >>> by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (Hefce) that £449m ­
> >>> equivalent to more than a 5% reduction nationally ­ would be stripped
> >>> out of university budgets.
> >>>
> >>> The University and College Union (UCU) believes that more than 15,000
> >>> posts ­ the majority academic ­ could disappear in the next few years.
> >>> Precise funding figures for each university will be released on 18
> >>> March.
> >>>
> >>> The chairman of the Russell Group of elite institutions, Professor
> >>> Michael Arthur, vice-chancellor of Leeds University, warned that budgets
> >>> would be further slashed by 6% in each of the next three years. Last
> >>> month he described the cuts as "devastating".
> >>>
> >>> The savings envisaged include:
> >>>
> >>> EUR More than 200 jobs losses at King's College, London, around 150 at
> >>> the
> >>> University of Westminster and, unions claim, as many as 700 at Leeds,
> >>> 340 at Sheffield Hallam and 300 at Hull.
> >>>
> >>> EUR Entire campus closures at Cumbria and Wolverhampton universities,
> >>> where buildings will be mothballed and students transferred to other
> >>> sites.
> >>>
> >>> EUR Teesside University scrapping £2m worth of scholarships and
> >>> bursaries
> >>> that would have helped poorer students. It will also share services with
> >>> a further education college in Darlington.
> >>>
> >>> EUR Postponing plans for a £25m creative arts building at Worcester and
> >>> £12m science block at Hertfordshire.
> >>>
> >>> EUR Under-subscribed arts and humanities courses are being dropped. The
> >>> University of the West of England has already stopped offering French,
> >>> German and Spanish; Surrey has dropped its BA in humanities.
> >>>
> >>> EUR Student/lecturer ratios are expected to rise, with more institutions
> >>> using postgraduates and short term staff filling in for professors made
> >>> redundant.
> >>>
> >>> Ballots for industrial action are due to be held or are pending at the
> >>> University of the Arts, Sussex University, the University of
> >>> Gloucestershire and King's College London. Lecturers at Leeds ­ where
> >>> 750 posts are at risk ­ voted by a large majority to strike this week.
> >>>
> >>> Higher exam pass marks will be required to win a place at university,
> >>> according to the survey of academic principals. The cap on student
> >>> numbers ­ set at 2008 levels ­ is restricting entry just as youth
> >>> unemployment is peaking and intensifying competitive pressure.
> >>>
> >>> Peter Mandelson, the business secretary who is in charge of
> >>> universities, accused the principals of "gross exaggerations" and
> >>> "extreme language", but would not be drawn over whether he would make
> >>> further cuts to higher education. Universities had to do "no more than
> >>> their fair share of belt-tightening," he said.
> >>>
> >>> "We know that universities have a vital contribution to our economic
> >>> growth, so we are not going to undermine them. We are asking for savings
> >>> of less than 5% and we expect universities to make these in a way that
> >>> minimises the impact on teaching and students. I am confident they
> >>> will."
> >>>
> >>> Mandelson also denied claims by vice-chancellors that he was letting
> >>> arts and humanities courses close and cared only about maths and science
> >>> degrees.
> >>>
> >>> On Monday it was announced that an extra £10m would go to the teaching
> >>> of science, technology, engineering and mathematics to support
> >>> universities "that are shifting the balance of their provision towards
> >>> these subjects".
> >>>
> >>> Mandelson said: "I am an arts graduate myself. We don't dictate to
> >>> universities which courses they put on. They tailor courses to meet
> >>> demand. We want universities to play to their strengths, but we also
> >>> want to keep this country civilised."
> >>>
> >>> The pattern of cutbacks is not uniform, with some universities insisting
> >>> they have been preparing for the downturn. Many have already dropped
> >>> more vulnerable subjects such as music and history, increased fees for
> >>> part-time students and expect to become even more reliant on income from
> >>> higher, overseas student fees.
> >>>
> >>> The vice-chancellor of Southampton, Professor Don Nutbeam, told the
> >>> Guardian: "This [decision by Hefce] is one of a series of insidious cuts
> >>> that have been made to higher education."
> >>>
> >>> Professor Geoffrey Petts, vice-chancellor of Westminster University,
> >>> said: "After a decade of huge successes in higher education we suddenly
> >>> have to rethink."
> >>>
> >>> Tomorrow the Universities and Colleges Admission Service (Ucas) is due
> >>> to announce record numbers of applications for places this autumn. It is
> >>> expected that as many as 300,000 applicants will be turned away.
> >>>
> >>> The surge in demand comes as a government-commissioned independent
> >>> review considers whether to raise tuition fees from £3,225 per year to
> >>> up to £7,000. Over three years total cuts will amount to at least £950m.
> >>>
> >>> The policy adopted by the government is in stark contrast to the
> >>> response in the US where President Obama this week proposed a 31%
> >>> increase in education spending for next year in order to combat
> >>> unemployment and develop skills.
> >>> *--
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
>
****************************************************************************>>>
> *
> >>> ************
> >>> To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to
> >>> http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html
> >>>
>
****************************************************************************>>>
> *
> >>> ************
> >
> > --
> > Lawrence D. Berg, D.Phil.
> > Co-Director, The Centre for Social, Spatial & Economic Justice
> > Graduate Coordinator, Human Geography
> >
> > Community, Culture and Global Studies
> > University of British Columbia
> > 3333 University Way
> > Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1V 1V7
> > Voice: +1 250.807.9392, Fax: +1 250.807.8001
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> > WEB: http://web.ubc.ca/okanagan/ccgs/faculty/berg.html
> >
> > Editor: ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies
> > http://www.acme-journal.org <http://www.acme-journal.org/>
> <http://www.acme-journal.org/>
> >
> > Co-Leader: BC Disabilities Health Research Network
> > http://www.dhrn.ca <http://www.dhrn.ca/>  <http://www.dhrn.ca/>
>
> --
> Lawrence D. Berg, D.Phil.
> Co-Director, The Centre for Social, Spatial & Economic Justice
> Graduate Coordinator, Human Geography
>
> Community, Culture and Global Studies
> University of British Columbia
> 3333 University Way
> Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1V 1V7
> Voice: +1 250.807.9392, Fax: +1 250.807.8001
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> WEB: http://web.ubc.ca/okanagan/ccgs/faculty/berg.html
>
> Editor: ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies
> http://www.acme-journal.org <http://www.acme-journal.org/>
> <http://www.acme-journal.org/>
>
> Co-Leader: BC Disabilities Health Research Network
> http://www.dhrn.ca <http://www.dhrn.ca/>  <http://www.dhrn.ca/>
>
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer:
>
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/planningAndCorporatePolicy/legalandComplianceTeam/legal/disclaimer.htm
>
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer:
>
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/planningAndCorporatePolicy/legalandComplianceTeam/legal/disclaimer.htm
>