Print

Print


After having seen many Na+ ions very likely correctly built and refined and many potential Na+ sites with
a very clear indication that the bond valence sum is already on the border of being water and being an ion
I would say that Na+ binding in proteins happens quite often and probably escapes "unobserved" by which I mean that
we do not notice because it simply is not so clear in so many cases.

If one assumes the very likely alternative of Na+/water alternative occupancy it muddles the distances sufficiently for us not to be able to say a clear YES or NO. I sometimes wish we had a "sodium detector" for such structures ..

Jan


On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, George M. Sheldrick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
A few years ago we thought that the bond valence method might provide
an answer to this problem and wrote a paper on the subject (Acta Cryst.
2003 D59 32-37). Subsequent experience has convinced me that although
this method works well for identifying ions such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ with
good resolution data, it is not reliable in other cases such as Na+,
and for this reason I never distributed the version of SHELXPRO that
includes the bond valence test (I would not like my programs to get a
bad name).

In fact we currently have a protein crystallized from a high NaCl
concentration that is giving us a lot of problems distinguishing
between Na+ and water molecules. Since we were able to find some
chlorides in the anomalous map we know that cations must also be
present, but the anomalous data are too weak to help much with Na+
because of its lower f".

There are however some tentative indicators for Na+. The bond valence
sum (the sum of the 'bond orders' to the surrounding atoms estimated
from the distances) tends to be higher than for Cl- or H2O.
Tetrahedral coordination is more likely to be water or Cl-, Na+
prefers 5 or 6 neighbors. And of course two cations (or two anions)
that are close to each other should not have an occupancy sum greater
than unity.

George

Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-22582


On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Eleanor Dodson wrote:

> Yes - we are puzzling over the same phenomena.
>
> Look at this web site set up by Marjorie Harding
>
> http://tanna.bch.ed.ac.uk/
>
> It lists the likely coordination patterns.
>
> We certainly have ideal Na bonding in our structure - but unfortunately we
> wanted to find Ca which has a very similar pattern!!
>
> Grrr
>
> Eleanor
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jacob Keller wrote:
> > Dear Crystallographers,
> >
> > I am looking at a 1.0 Angstrom structure which contains many waters, but I
> > am wondering whether some of them might really be sodium ions. Is there any
> > straightforward way to distinguish between these two, and if so, what is the
> > software which implements this? Although the electron density difference
> > between sodium and water should be very small, perhaps the binding geometry
> > would provide a clearer distinction? Has anybody encountered this question
> > before?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jacob Keller
> >
> > *******************************************
> > Jacob Pearson Keller
> > Northwestern University
> > Medical Scientist Training Program
> > Dallos Laboratory
> > F. Searle 1-240
> > 2240 Campus Drive
> > Evanston IL 60208
> > lab: 847.491.2438
> > cel: 773.608.9185
> > email: [log in to unmask]
> > *******************************************
>



--
Jan Dohnalek, Ph.D
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Heyrovskeho nam. 2
16206 Praha 6
Czech Republic

Tel: +420 296 809 390
Fax: +420 296 809 410