 |
 |
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:02 -0800, Catherine Daly wrote: > it only includes the prize winners, the faculty, > the capitals. I thought the article was hostile... thanks the the explanations as to who is who (not just Catherine's, others also.) The MFA thing looks more like education as a saleable commodity, hence knowledge need not be true, since truth can't sold. (There is a logic here, basically it will contradict.) A lot of academic debates take the form of protecting an investment in knowledge as a commodity in recent times and it would be true the US grad education lead the way.