 |
 |
Its obviously one of those weeks... Apologies, I've discovered the error was on my part. I was running featquery and pulling the data straight into matlab. I just ran the Featquery gui and the screen full of EVs reminded me that featquery uses real EVs not original EVs and so I was loading in the wrong data... simon On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:42:39 -0500, Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Hi - does the full model fit make sense? The partial model fits will >be hard to interpret for the FIR basis set. >Cheers. > > >On 20 Jan 2010, at 11:17, Simon Rushton wrote: > >> I have run featquery on the results of an analysis that uses FIR >> basis functions for the convolution. >> >> The basic results look pretty much as I'd expect - similar >> activation pattern to that I get with double-gamma. But the peri- >> stimulus plots I get from featquery don't. >> >> Looking at the peri-stimulus plots (zstat) from the standard double- >> gamma analysis I see clearly different curves and data points for >> each EV. Looking at the peri-stimulus plots (zfstat) from the FIR >> analysis (for exactly the same ROI) I find two overlapping curves >> and two overlapping sets of datapoints. >> >> Am I missing something, have I messed up a setting, or have I >> stumbled on a bug? >> >> simon >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering >Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre > >FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK >+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717) >[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >