>>>>>>> A FRIENDLY REMINDER: if you click REPLY to this email, you will be sending an email to over 1400 subscribers. Please do so only if you wish to respond to everyone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi, It is: Munich, July, 26-31, 2010 http://www.iftr2010.theaterwissenschaft.uni-muenchen.de/iftr2010/generalinfo /index.html Best wishes! David -- Dr. David Roesner Head of Department Department of Drama School of Arts, Literatures and Languages University of Exeter Thornlea, New North Road EX4 4LA Exeter [log in to unmask] 0044 1392 72-2421 On 06/01/2010 09:38, "Franziska Schroeder" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>>>> A FRIENDLY REMINDER: if you click REPLY to this email, you will be >>>>>>>> sending an email to over 1400 subscribers. Please do so only if you >>>>>>>> wish to respond to everyone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>>>> Does anybody know the dates for this conference? > > > On 2 Dec 2009, at 10:42, ANNA BIRCH wrote: > >>>>>>>>> A FRIENDLY REMINDER: if you click REPLY to this email, you will be >>>>>>>>> sending an email to over 1400 subscribers. Please do so only if you >>>>>>>>> wish to respond to everyone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>>>>>>>>> A FRIENDLY REMINDER: if you click REPLY to this email, you will be >>>>>>>>>> sending an email to over 1400 subscribers. Please do so only if you >>>>>>>>>> wish to respond to everyone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> FIRT/IFTR Performance as Research Working Group Munich Conference, 2010 >>> PERFORMANCE AS RESEARCH AND THE MULTI-LAYERED ARCHIVE:REPETITION, TIME and >>> GENERATIVE PROCESSES Call for Contributions Repetition is fundamental to >>> generative and compositional processes in performance, from traditional >>> notions of rehearsal (indeed, répétition in French) to all other processes >>> through which manifestations of performance processes iterate themselves. >>> The performances we produce might be derived from improvisational >>> strategies, scores, scripts, physical/sonic/ visual 'writing' in space and >>> time, and/or solo or collaborative processes of myriad kinds, but all of >>> them involve relationships between conception, repetition and choices around >>> the transformations caused by iteration and reiteration, including the ways >>> we adapt a performance to its social, cultural, financial and institutional >>> contexts. What new knowledge, understanding, practices and imperatives does >>> the act of repetition drive in performance? How do multiple iterations of a >>> creative process or concept provide fertile ground for exploring this >>> territory? Derived from the above, for this year's meeting, we would like >>> to interrogate together how iterative processes in Performance as Research >>> build on each other, which will explore questions such as: What kinds of >>> knowledges emerge from repeating within our creative and production >>> processes? How does the multi-layering engendered by repetition, >>> documentation and reiteration impact on the new knowledges created through >>> these processes? How does this process draw on performance and theatre >>> rehearsal histories and methods? To what extent do our creative processes >>> simply re-embody or reiterate aesthetic decisions made by others in the past >>> and present? What do we learn from reiterating in this way? How does >>> Performance as Research - generating insight and knowledge through an >>> analytical/doing continuum - contribute to exploring palimpsest and >>> iteration in unique ways? Responding to the above engages necessarily with >>> what we might call the 'liveness debate'... from Phelan's assertion that >>> performance's specificity is that its experience cannot really be repeated - >>> insisting on its ephemerality - through to Auslander's opinions suggesting >>> that we are simply romanticising the live to view it as so precious. Makers >>> of work, however, are always conceiving, trying, iterating, revising, >>> repeating and trying again; balancing the precious and the ephemeral and >>> weighing it against what might be repeated. Beyond the polarities of the >>> liveness debate, case studies from personal practice can add insight to >>> these questions from a series of original and inter-subjective standpoints, >>> and can also re-engage with the role of documentation and the ways it can >>> nourish iterative processes from a practitioner standpoint. For this year's >>> IFTR meeting, and after exploration of several formats for sharing our >>> knowledge via a range of practices from paper-giving to performance lectures >>> to immersive practices, we invite contributions that respond to this call in >>> the following format: 1. Potential participants in the Working Group should >>> send an abstract of maximum (250) words to Anna Birch ([log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ) in English or French by: 31 January 2010. 2. >>> The process for accepting abstracts will be competitive. A sub-group >>> consisting of the Working Group convenors Anna Birch and Mark Fleishman, >>> assisted by Yvon Bonefant, will review all abstracts and make selections. >>> Those applicants whose abstracts are selected will be asked to develop a >>> fully-fledged paper of around 3000 words which will be posted to a secure >>> web site. The concept Opaper¹ should be understood as including a range of >>> styles and formats from the more traditional academic writing to performance >>> writing to theorised, media-rich formats. The paper will be due on 15 May >>> 2010 and any papers submitted after this date will be excluded from the >>> Working Group. 3. A maximum of 12 papers will be selected. 4. All papers >>> will be available to Working Group members on a secure web site. 5. Three >>> groups made up of up to three core Working Group members (those who have >>> been involved in the Working Group for a period of atleast one year) will be >>> invited to communicate with one another to begin to develop performative >>> responses to the papers, across the whole range of possible formats >>> (workshops for participants, performances, improvisations, multi-media >>> experiences). These might be based around concerns raised across papers, >>> topical/thematic groupings, or individual or small group critical responses. >>> 6. During the Working Group meeting in Munich, these performative responses >>> will be presented for and together with, the full Working Group present and >>> improvisatory responses to them will take place as part of a dialectic >>> process which will be facilitated by group members. 7. The above process >>> will be documented by the group. 8. An important part of the remit of the >>> Working Group has been to encourage newcomers to the international >>> performance as research debate to engage with the core group's research >>> processes. Therefore, in addition to the 12 participants whose papers are >>> selected a further 10 places will be open to attendees who have not >>> participated in the working group before but will be at the conference and >>> who wish to participate in the Working Group meetings. This will make space >>> for new or more recent members to partake in the work. Applicants who wish >>> to be considered for one of these 10 places should submit a brief CV and >>> statement of interest in Performance as Research to the convenors by 31 >>> January 2010. 9. In addition to the Working Group sessions described above, >>> Annette Arlander will convene a panel in the Main Programme on behalf of the >>> Working Group entitled: "Exhausting modernity - repetition, time and >>> generative processes". This panel is open to core group members only (those >>> who have attended at least one conference Working Group meeting). Those >>> people making panel presentations will be expected to attend the working >>> group and participate in the activities. If you wish to be considered for >>> this panel please indicate this clearly at the top of your application and >>> submit your abstract of maximum (250) words to Anna Birch ([log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ) in English or French by: 31 January 2010. 10. >>> All accepted contributors will be asked to take on roles in managing the >>> development of the responses and the exchanges about the papers in >>> preparation for the meeting. >>> ______________ To join, leave or suspend list postings, visit >>> www.scudd.org.uk/list <http://www.scudd.org.uk/list> ______________ >> ______________ To join, leave or suspend list postings, visit >> www.scudd.org.uk/list <http://www.scudd.org.uk/list> ______________ > > ______________ To join, leave or suspend list postings, visit > www.scudd.org.uk/list ______________ ______________ To join, leave or suspend list postings, visit www.scudd.org.uk/list ______________