Print

Print


it wasn't anything new to read, but I do have a couple of thoughts
about the way social networking, especially facebook and goodreads,
are getting used

it is especially difficult because some of these people are, of
course, only known to one "virtually," but also because one
increasingly counters the lonliness of writing with social networking;
this interaction has done a lot of replace "region" among certain
people

and facebook started as an academically-focussed network

 because so many people are promo-ing books there, one might set one's
policy against things like becoming a fan or "friending" presses,
organizations, or certain writers to avoid the endless quasi-spam

the second is that since especially younger writers have set the tone
of giving all of their friends' and teachers' books five stars on good
reads, rave "comments" elsewhere -- regardless of actual thoughts on
the matter because these contacts are needed MORE THAN EVER for
networking, and because these little non review reviews are
increasingly the means of networking, in a more direct way than ever

the star rating not only has no meaning, but is now REQUIRED; I have
been forced to grit my teeth and give five star ratings of really
pretty dull books just to "get along" -- after starting with the
"three stars is a C" idea -- had to go back re: star inflation and
give everyone I might actually have to interact with in person five
stars -- thankfully, they changed one star from "it was ok" to "didn't
like it" -- it had been like amazon, with no way to rate at no stars



-- 
All best,
Catherine Daly
[log in to unmask]