 |
 |
Which is too high and which too low? You measured the HEPSPEC06 (I hope!!). Did you measure SI2K or just take a number from some suppliers web page? If we all actually measure our resources then we will have a consistent set of numbers with which to compare sites. So some of the old ones were wrong? That's what the exercise was about - SI2K was no longer accepted as a good measure of the power of modern systems to run HEP codes. Now what we do about this discrepancy in past accounting? That's a different question. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alessandra Forti > Sent: 01 October 2009 01:02 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: HEPSPEC06 and kSI2k Publishing > > > > Looking at the SL4 kSI2k numbers we used and the HEPSPEC06 > numbers we got it seems to be more like 4.5 to 4.6 so > our > recalculated kSI2k numbers are 10-15% too high. > > You are not the only one. A lot of sites have a different > conversion factor. > > cheers > alessandra > > -- > Mindmelds. The last time I heard the words "my mind to your > mind", I had a headache for two weeks. (Janeway, ST Voyager) > > Northgrid Tier2 Technical Coordinator > http://www.hep.manchester.ac.uk/computing/tier2 > -- Scanned by iCritical.