 |
 |
Tim also suggests a snapshot of the Assignment --> NOE Contributions in the Peak Assignments tab. So it's possible that there is a lower bound rather than an upper bound violation because of the way the "NOE sum" works. Wayne On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Wayne Boucher wrote: > Hello, > > We're not quite sure what is going on, can you send us a screen shot (not via > the mailing list if you don't want)? > > Thanks, Wayne > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Magnus Kjaergaard wrote: > >> Hi everybody... >> I'm comparing a NOE list to a structure using the "Restraints and >> Violations" menu. >> >> The problems is that Analysis flags a lot of restraints as violated that >> clearly aren't violated in the structure. This seems to stem from the way >> non-stereo specific atoms are treated, where as far as I can see it is >> flagged as violated if just one of the possible atom combinations is >> outside >> the restraint bounds, even though the "Struc Value" is well inside the >> bounds. >> >> Is this a correct interpretation and if so is that the way it is intended >> to >> work? (I would think it would be more useful to have it appear as violated, >> only if none of the possible atom combinations were within the bounds). >> >> Magnus >> Uni. of Copenhagen/The Scripps Research Institute >> >