Print

Print




On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Shaun Lott <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
In my experience, DALI can be better than SSM at detecting distant
structural similarities.

this is interesting. Do you take into account that, in difference of DALI, SSM
has a control on the remoteness of structural hits that it delivers? By default,
it looks only at fairly similar hits. It grabs more hits as you pull the similarity
threshold down. And if you set that similarity threshold zero, nearly every query
gathers half of PDB as potential targets - because small features are shared
between many structures.

I would be very curious to see an example where SSM *is not able* to catch
something that DALI catches - leaving aside SSM limitations like presence
of secondary structure and having at least 2-3 SSEs in the common motif.

Eugene
 
You might also want to try CE. To decide if a fold
is 'new' rather than 'old but decorated' often boils down to a somewhat
subjective call, but asking Alexei Murzin is as good a way as any to decide :-)

For domain definition, try http://pdomains.sdsc.edu/ which offers a handy
interface for comparing a number of different methods for automatic domain
calling.

hope this helps

Shaun